G. S. Kohli
International Vice-Captain
Rodney Redmond 165 on debut vs pak never call back by NZ when Glen Turner retured after injury.
To be fair, he made another 200 immediately afterwards. It just took him 18 innings.Zak Crawley has a Test double century.
Went back to the farm and a real job I believe. I think Frank Tyson just about qualifies for this thread.George Bissett.
A South African fast bowler who toured England in 1924 and broke down before the test series, not playing first class for several years afterwards. He was recalled for the second test in 27/28 on the tenuous basis of performing in a club match and went on to take 25 wickets in four tests, including 7/29 in the final innings of series which SA levelled. He only played two further first class matches with little success.
Indeed, and he seems still to have been successful in the Currie Cup through the mid-'60s - rough not to have been given another gig.Lawrence still has the best innings figures (8-53) for any South African pace bowler (though he's actually from Zimbabwe - he'd have the record for them as well).
He played Masters T20 for Australia when he was 37 too.Posted about him here a while back, but I always thought Simon Cook had a very interesting career. Fringe Shield fast bowler for Victoria, injured a lot, barely gets a game, moves to NSW, still injured a lot, still barely gets a game, gets fit again, gets picked for Australia off having 3 wickets at 53 in a couple of Shield games, takes 5 poles second innings on Test dayboo, plays another Test, gets injured yet again, gets run over by a steamroller, comes back to domestix, gets injured some more, drifts out of the First Class game before his 30th birthday
Strange old career that
Apropos of nothing I was at his granddaughter's wedding this weekend.One series wonder was SA wicket-keeper bat, Denis Lindsay.
Against Aust in 1966/67 in SA ( 5 Test series), scored 606 runs @86.57 , with 3 centuries. ( only 524 runs in his other 14 Tests)
Also took a then SA record of 24 catches in the series.
The thread is about players that had a good series or Test and never reproduced that form or were left out for some inexplicable reason. Richards never played again because of politics, not because he was ever picked again.Barry Richards
We know the stories of those who burnt brightly for a moment only to fade. Richards is a tantalising story of what might have been...The thread is about players that had a good series or Test and never reproduced that form or were left out for some inexplicable reason. Richards never played again because of politics, not because he was ever picked again.
A few years earlier, Sivaramakrishnan had a similar experience: after an unsuccessful debut in Antigua in 1983, he was recalled a couple of years later (still in his teens) and took 19-321 in the first two Tests v England in 1984-5. But by then England had worked out how to play him, and in the rest of the series he took 4-402. He only played another 3 Tests after that, taking 3-327.Narendra Hirwani. At 20 debuted vs WI and went on to take 16 wickets in that match, becoming a celebrity overnight. Followed that with 20 wickets in a 3 test series vs the touring NZ. And the dream just like that ended. He toured NZ, WI and Eng and was dropped afterwards. Rather cruel given these places aren't exactly spinners paradises.
I remember Gower's comment about the first test, which India won comfortably, involving 'a leg spinner that we'd never seen before and an umpire that we never wanted to see again.' Without looking it up, England must have worked a few things out by the second test, as they won that one almost as comfortably. I suppose most of the side wouldn't have seen any leg spin at all unless they'd gone to Pakistan 12 months earlier and faced Abdul Qadir. Perhaps only Fowler, Gower and Lamb from the top 7.A few years earlier, Sivaramakrishnan had a similar experience: after an unsuccessful debut in Antigua in 1983, he was recalled a couple of years later (still in his teens) and took 19-321 in the first two Tests v England in 1984-5. But by then England had worked out how to play him, and in the rest of the series he took 4-402. He only played another 3 Tests after that, taking 3-327.
Wow, that's new info for me. Gavaskar screwing India with a slow mo innings wonder how this went under the radar. Wierd given how well Indian openers batted in first innings.A few years earlier, Sivaramakrishnan had a similar experience: after an unsuccessful debut in Antigua in 1983, he was recalled a couple of years later (still in his teens) and took 19-321 in the first two Tests v England in 1984-5. But by then England had worked out how to play him, and in the rest of the series he took 4-402. He only played another 3 Tests after that, taking 3-327.
Incidentally, does anyone remember this match - Sivaramakrishnan's penultimate Test? I have vague memories of an article by an Indian cricket fan about how he basically spent the whole of the last day yelling at his TV/radio in disbelief at India's failure to win (brief summary: Australia were effectively 48-9 after 2 overs on the last day; Border and Gilbert managed to add another 77 before Border was out just after lunch; India then scored just 59-2 off the 25 overs before tea, despite the threat of rain - which duly came and wiped out the final session).