• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in India 2023

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Warner is probably done for the series

IF Renshaw can get a score, that might be him done for good
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Then he should have overturned upon the review which is literally further investigation, because of lack of sufficient evidence, and in case of doubt, you have to give it to the batsmen
Yeah this is incorrect. The protocol explicitly gives the benefit of the doubt to whatever the initial decision was - so in that case, the bowler.
 

TimAngas

State Vice-Captain
Was Renshaw legally allowed to open the batting, or was Warner off the field for too long? Just wondering if Head opening was tactical or enforced.
 

Top