Anyone who thinks that clearly hasn't watched test cricket in India post 1999, we're much better batting second albeit on flat roads/slower decks!So much for the winning the toss and winning the Test theory in India.
Thought that was an enormous advantage for Australia, but India were relentless with the ball.
View overall figures [change view] |
Primary team India |
Home or away home venue |
Start of match date greater than or equal to 1 Jan 2000 |
Batting or fielding first fielding first |
Totals in terms of batting team |
Ordered by win/loss ratio (descending) |
Page 1 of 1 | Showing 1 - 1 of 1 |
| Next
| Return to query menu Cleared query menu |
when the alternate is facing Jadeja/Ash/Axar in 4th innings no team will want to take that riskAnyone who thinks that clearly hasn't watched test cricket in India post 1999, we much better batting second, albeit on flat roads/slower decks!
Everyone knows this except Rahul
He's got all the shots , all his best innings have been when he's looking to use them instead of trying to bat pragmatically
Horses for courses is fine but not when your replacement is Renshaw lolThink Usman can sympathise with Head on his horses for courses dumping. Post-modern cricket thinking outside of the scope of Bazball is literally cooked.
I completely disagree. Picking a guy with a big mouth to do a oral scene in a porno doesn't mean it's going to make the other guy ejaculate quicker.Horses for courses is fine but not when your replacement is Renshaw lol
He might have those glasses where the bottom third is for reading. He wouldn't even be able to see his feet.he's got four eyes but can't even stay behind the line. smh