• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* South Africa vs England (3 ODI):Jan 27-Feb 04, 2023 in SAfrica

Howe_zat

Howe_zat

Audio File
I think that burst from Archer is probably going to decide it. Difference between Miller and Jansen (list A high score of 43) too big with half the runs to get.

Overall our attack in this series has been pretty poor though. Curran's turn to be a bit all over the place today it seems. And yeah I fear Mo might be properly done at this stage, despite a nice cameo with the bat today. He's not being trusted to bowl and that mean his spot may as well be Livingstone or someone.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
grecian said:
Got a bad back I'm afraid,

Yeah, this isn't looking great. Our bowling really needs an overhaul, think we probably need the three fast bowlers in the squad. Maybe give Malan an over, can't do any worse.
Click to expand...
I'm trying the think who we're missing from our first choice attack today. Wood, I suppose. I'm not sure that Willey is much of an upgrade. I must have forgotten someone, surely.
 
grecian

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
wpdavid said:
I'm trying the think who we're missing from our first choice attack today. Wood, I suppose. I'm not sure that Willey is much of an upgrade. I must have forgotten someone, surely.
Click to expand...
Wood definitely, and Stone looked the best of the seamers before this. Yet Topley has been hugely disappointing.

Thanks for the brainlessness though, Saffies, I know it's not the modern way, but surely you just look to knock a few singles of Archer and feast on the buffet at the other end.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
grecian said:
Wood definitely, and Stone looked the best of the seamers before this. Yet Topley has been hugely disappointing.

Thanks for the brainlessness though, Saffies, I know it's not the modern way, but surely you just look to knock a few singles of Archer and feast on the buffet at the other end.
Click to expand...
Stone's the one I'd forgotten. Maybe Topley's just having an off day. He was good for us in 2022 wasn't he? Or was that just in T20s?
 
Howe_zat

Howe_zat

Audio File
wpdavid said:
I'm trying the think who we're missing from our first choice attack today. Wood, I suppose. I'm not sure that Willey is much of an upgrade. I must have forgotten someone, surely.
Click to expand...
You could maybe make a case for Jordan. But I would rather Sam Curran just be better than he's shown today, which to be honest he usually is.

Good news is that Archer may well be on the way back up and having at least one of Wood and Stone fit seems likely.

Attack for the world cup is probably Archer, Wood/Stone, Curran, Rashid, Stokes, Livingstone/Root.
 
Kenneth Viljoen

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
To be honest, 3-0 would have flattered us hugely, England have played very good cricket the whole series just been sloppy in patches
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Howe_zat said:
You could maybe make a case for Jordan. But I would rather Sam Curran just be better than he's shown today, which to be honest he usually is.

Good news is that Archer may well be on the way back up and having at least one of Wood and Stone fit seems likely.

Attack for the world cup is probably Archer, Wood/Stone, Curran, Rashid, Stokes, Livingstone/Root.
Click to expand...
Yeah maybe. Being played in India isn't it? One specialist spinner looks odd over there, but I can see the sense in it given the resources at our disposal.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Kenneth Viljoen said:
To be honest, 3-0 would have flattered us hugely, England have played very good cricket the whole series just been sloppy in patches
Click to expand...
Yes, this one isn't dissimilar to the first game when England's batsmen gave it away when the game was there for the taking. Great to see Archer back. And none of his five wickets have been freebies; all of them were important blokes.

EDIT
Not Shamsi I suppose, but he was entitled to an easy sixth one.
 
Howe_zat

Howe_zat

Audio File
wpdavid said:
Yeah maybe. Being played in India isn't it? One specialist spinner looks odd over there, but I can see the sense in it given the resources at our disposal.
Click to expand...
It does to be fair. Maybe one of the new people will get something together in Bangladesh, or p'raps Moeen Ali will make a much better case than he did in this series.

That said, it's ODI cricket at the end of the day. The wickets don't fall apart.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Nintendo said:
Archer is just a class above the other ODI pacers in this england test side. Beast
Click to expand...
Only the fifth time an England bowler has taken six wickets in an ODI. One of the others was Collingwood, who is the only one not to have played in today's match.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top