duffer
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No Pay TV?Didn't realise Ashwin's Test record was so good to be honest.
Averaging 27 with bat & <25 with the ball, how did I miss this.
No Pay TV?Didn't realise Ashwin's Test record was so good to be honest.
Averaging 27 with bat & <25 with the ball, how did I miss this.
Just haven't looked at his record for a few years, I know it was even better at 4-5 years back but somehow thought it had deteriorated more than it has.No Pay TV?
Jaddu's is even better. What a playerJust haven't looked at his record for a few years, I know it was even better at 4-5 years back but somehow thought it had deteriorated more than it has.
Ashwin v Vettori would be a great comparisonDidn't realise Ashwin's Test record was so good to be honest.
Averaging 27 with bat & <25 with the ball, how did I miss this.
Referring to your post in the other thread.
Comprehension helpsReferring to your post in the other thread.
I'm sorry I didn't continue posting after questioning a mistake in the OP.
Probably the question came up about 4 years too early. Let Ashwin finish his career first to have any fair comparison. He is already close to 36 years and played less than 90 tests. If he gets another 50 (unlikely though) he can be close to Warne in terms of wickets and may even surpass Kapil Dev in terms of runs scored. Put it another way "the greatest allrounder to have ever played the game."Has Ashwin surpassed Warne as the greatest conventional spin bowler of all time? I can kind of guess where the poll will lean towards, but just wanted to spark some discussion.
Obviously Ashwin has a long way to go to get to the cumulative wickets taken stat of Warne, but already his average is over a point lower than Warne's, which although a simplistic measure, is the general starting point for these discussions. Does anyone think Ashwin's already better if he retired tomorrow? If not, what would it take to get him there, just more longevity, or some specific achievements?
Not so sure on this one, as his batting average sits at 27.41 currently, and would have to improve some points for mine. He might already have the "greatest spin bowling allrounder" tag sewn up though, depending on how you classify Sobers.Probably the question came up about 4 years too early. Let Ashwin finish his career first to have any fair comparison. He is already close to 36 years and played less than 90 tests. If he gets another 50 (unlikely though) he can be close to Warne in terms of wickets and may even surpass Kapil Dev in terms of runs scored. Put it another way "the greatest allrounder to have ever played the game."
I mean, make a silly poll, get a silly result.Voted Ashwin because no one should be humiliated this badly in a poll.
Define proper. “Who was a great player of pace bowling?” Bradman won’t get many votes cos he only averaged 50 odd vs Bodlyine. “Which ATG would Kane Williamson destroy the most?” Marshall cos he sucked in NZ.Are Bradman and Marshall the only cricketers who can never be humiliated in a proper poll ?
Who's a better leg-spin bowler, Bradman or O'Reilly?Are Bradman and Marshall the only cricketers who can never be humiliated in a proper poll ?
These are not proper poll . These are troll poll.Who's a better leg-spin bowler, Bradman or O'Reilly?
Who's a better Barbadian batsman, Marshall or Frank Worrell?
You could try a a straight McGrath vs Marshall. I think the demographics of this forum could have shifted enough that you might get more for McGrath now than in previous iterations from decades past.Are Bradman and Marshall the only cricketers who can never be humiliated in a proper poll ?
Do you know what humiliation means ?You could try a a straight McGrath vs Marshall. I think the demographics of this forum could have shifted enough that you might get more for McGrath now than in previous iterations from decades past.
Yeah he's seen your postsDo you know what humiliation means ?