• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia vs South Africa -2022/3

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Pune 2017 was a good pitch and I have no idea what that was the one that people bring up when the pitch that came after that was clearly much more of a lottery especially by Day 3.
I dont think any of the pitches that series were bad except for maybe Ranchi which was one that would suck the life out of test cricket.


And for a while Pujara and Saha and then Smarsh and the other guy did.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I mean wasn't that when SA were quite explicit that they were doctoring pitches to suit their quicks? Hard to have too much sympathy for Elgar and co there.
Yeah, that funny period which coincided with Maharaj's form slump.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Wont have sat out injured, for starters. :ph34r:
Should bring him back just to read pitches before toss, would get every one right just by the injuries developed after observation.
The worst pitch by far this decade was Jorburg 2018 in the Ind vs SA series. I'm not exaggerating when I say it could be considered genuinely life threatening.
They were going to call it off when the Saffers were getting hurt, after India batted twice smh. Disgraceful.:blue_band
 

Bahseph

International Debutant
Yeah, that funny period which coincided with Maharaj's form slump.
Somewhere around this time the decision was made to not focus on grooming Test batsman who can score 100's and dish out pace friendly pitches and hope SA cobble together 300 somehow.
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
Indentations (acknowledged by commentators) = excessive movement off the seam = unacceptable pitch.

I accept that the bowling attacks are stronger than the batting line-ups (especially SA) but a two day Test isn't good for Test cricket. Financially it is a disaster.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Australia/Curator took a big risk going with a pitch like this.

If South Africa had won the toss, match would be a lot closer than right now.
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
There's a remote chance this test is all over today if S.A get skittled for something like 120. FMD Australia could win by an innings yet.
Who's the big winner there? Collections at the gate end up minimal, television audiences miss out and last but not least we here at CW get robbed
of days of cricket. Really does make you wonder what the curator was thinking producing this jungle.
It's greener than a ripe marijuana plantation ffs, the curator himself must of been stoned out of his brain.
S T O N E D
T
O
N
E
D
 

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
Well they have junk batting. As I said, Better batting side say India would have put up around 200
I agree , and not just junk Batting but a poor attitude aswell , Zondo trying to get a not out , the heads drop so quickly there's no fight ...A lack of honesty as well , Elgar at the toss saying he would have batted first (Who the **** is he kidding? ?), everyone in the SA setup pretending the exclusion of Rickleton is okay ...So toxic .
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
Like there have been some turning pitches in Tests I've seen that are definitely worse than this, but likewise if there was a seaming wicket that was as bad as those turning wickets (for example if Paul Collingwood was taking 6 for 9) that would be just as bad. I just don't think there have been seaming wickets that get as bad as the more extreme examples of dustbowls that have popped up
part of this is because on seamy pitches you've got three pace bowlers who take all the wickets though, whereas in the spin pitch examples that you cite where an elgar type can take five that's often partly a function of that guy being the second team's touring spinner. for all we know kyle mayers could roll in and take five on this pitch effortlessly, but we wouldn't know because he isn't going to get a bowl on a pitch like this in an attack that already has got starc boland and the cumster.

and i say this as someone who thinks this pitch rocks, i just don't think your argument holds
 

Top