• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

England test tour of Pakistan December 2022

slow deck

Cricket Spectator
I live in Aus, and whilst i go for Pak it seems they've made many improvements in last 12 months in test cricket:
Captaincy, coach, tactics (3rd test vs Pak declaration for eg.), batting lineup, record overseas, bowling lineup (Lyon's improved, Green adds flexibility, Head a decent option too), team environment also seems calmer and more positive under Cummins and new coach

The only thing that seems worse is Warner :laugh:
 

Red_Ink_Squid

Global Moderator
Butler's going to be called back soon anyway. He fits their current philosophy too much to just be a white ball specialist.
Might be when Bairstow comes back he slots in as keeper so that Brooks can keep his spot.

But yeah, don't like the decision for this Test. Foakes' keeping vs Pope's keeping adds a lot more value than Jacks' bowling vs Root's bowling. Foakes the better bat as well.
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
It's a really tough call on Foakes but the truth is that he's always going to be vulnerable to getting dropped for a better batsman who can also keep.

This time it's Pope but in the future it could easily be YJB or Buttler.

Going forward it's hard to see much of a future for Foakes when the attacking option would be to pick one of the better batsmen options rather than a specialist keeper.

Good to see Woody back after yet another injury. We must wrap him up in cotton wool next year for the Ashes
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Stokes innings at Headingley wasn’t “Bazball” but it did show the Australian bowling and fielding could get a bit ragged under pressure,
But for that you will have to hope that every Ashes test ends up like Headingley/Gabba nail-biters, I'll be very impressed if England go to lunch at 160/1 on the day 1 of an Ashes test match.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
But for that you will have to hope that every Ashes test ends up like Headingley/Gabba nail-biters, I'll be very impressed if England go to lunch at 160/1 on the day 1 of an Ashes test match.
The point has nothing to do with nail-biters. The point is they lost control under pressure. If they’re being hit off their length and conceding runs quickly the same thing could happen, with strong emphasis on the “could”.
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
It's a really tough call on Foakes but the truth is that he's always going to be vulnerable to getting dropped for a better batsman who can also keep.

This time it's Pope but in the future it could easily be YJB or Buttler.

Going forward it's hard to see much of a future for Foakes when the attacking option would be to pick one of the better batsmen options rather than a specialist keeper.

Good to see Woody back after yet another injury. We must wrap him up in cotton wool next year for the Ashes
ollie pope can't keep though??
 

Gremlin

U19 Vice-Captain
Not happy about Pope keeping the gloves either, I think YJB is now a shoe in for the keeper once he recovers from injury. Sad for Foakes, I actually think he could have performed really well here with both bat and gloves.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Stokes did really go out of his way to say it'd have absolutely no implications for future tests:

“The communication to Ben was that the real positive for him to take out of this selection is that it’s just for this Test match,” said Stokes.

“Foakesy still is the number one gloveman in England and I’ll still keep saying it that he’s the best keeper in the world. It must sound a bit silly to not be picking him, but you’ve got to look at the conditions we face out here. Pakistan is a very hard place to come and bowl."
"It's obviously very tough on Foakesy to miss out on this game," Stokes told BBC Sport.

"Pakistan is very hard place to come and win, especially in the longer format. Understanding that makes decisions like this, as hard they are, a little bit easier.

"One thing we did say to him was not to take it as any future marking on himself in this team. It's for this Test match at the moment.

"We had to take the decision on what we thought was the best way of creating 20 chances on this pitch."
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Lord Stokes of Christchurch said:
We had to take the decision on what we thought was the best way of creating 20 chances on this pitch.
Trouble with Ben's logic is, with a sub par keeper, England are likely to need to create far more than 20 chances.

That said I do think Foakes's keeping is a bit overrated.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I quite like the Wood selection tbh.
Yeah Wood coming in makes sense but even though Jacks bowled much better in the first Test than I was expecting I think England's bowling attack would actually be improved more by having a reliable keeper than having Jacks as a 6th/7th bowler... and the batting will probably be improved more by not having to make the #3 keep for half the game than the difference between Jacks and Foakes as well (if there is one in Jacks's favour at all?)
 
Last edited:

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Yeah Wood coming in makes sense but even though Jacks bowled much better in the first Test than I was expecting I actually think England's bowling attack would actually be improved more by having a reliable keeper than having Jacks as a 6th/7th bowler... and the batting will probably be improved more by not having to make the #3 keep for half the game than the difference between Jacks and Foakes as well (if there is one in Jacks's favour at all?)
Without checking I'm pretty sure Foakes has a higher FC average.

Jacks previously thought of as a white ball chap, really.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Are these curators getting salary on time from the PCB as these pitches can only be made by those working under some kind of protest.
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
The keeper situation going forward for England will be interesting.

It's hard to see Foakes keeping the gloves long term and Pope is surely just a short term fix.

That leaves YJB and Buttler. If we go for Johnny then we can play Brook but who bats at 7 - Johnny presumably which given his form last summer seems too low.

Buttler seems the obvious choice although he averages 31, the same at test level as Foakes He's so talented but never quite got the balance between attack and defence right at test level.

You'd hope that under McCullum and Stokes, Buttler would improve his record. He's also a 1st class leader in the dressing room and that can't be under estimated.

But then who misses out - Brook presumably which would be harsh.

The other wild card option would be Duckett who can keep - I'm not sure if he's test level and his place on the side is far from assured so it would be a long shot.

I think they'll go down the Buttler route and we'll have some real competition for the middle order spots.
 

Top