• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

CricketWeb selects the ATG ODI XI

Migara

International Coach
Nope. Dhoni is a better keeper to spinners. Especially if you are going to play Murali +/- Saqlain. Dhoni is a better ODI bat than Gilchrist too.
 

Migara

International Coach
Dhoni was never known for his keeping.
Still he was able to read Murali, where as Gilchrist whacked it on length. Saqlain would be still more difficult to read, and Gilchrist was never good against him, once again, sweep on length policy.
 

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
Nope. Dhoni is a better keeper to spinners. Especially if you are going to play Murali +/- Saqlain. Dhoni is a better ODI bat than Gilchrist too.
While i agree with the first, this is not true at all. Dhoni was great for a short period of time then became ****. Dhoni S/R is extremely bad compared to Gilchrist when we adjust for the era they batted in. Dhoni's average flatters him because of the era and the position he batted in . I would much rather prefer a 30 ball 40 from Gilchrist at the top than a 50 ball 45 from Dhoni in the last 15 overs.
 

Migara

International Coach
I don't know what batting strategy has to do with wicket keeping.
You should have watched the supertest in 2006, the way Boucher behind the wicket, was struggling against Murali. Missed few stumping chance or two because he simply could not read Murali. And that is exactly how he played too. Mow to the leg on length.
 

Migara

International Coach
While i agree with the first, this is not true at all. Dhoni was great for a short period of time then became ****. Dhoni S/R is extremely bad compared to Gilchrist when we adjust for the era they batted in. Dhoni's average flatters him because of the era and the position he batted in . I would much rather prefer a 30 ball 40 from Gilchrist at the top than a 50 ball 45 from Dhoni in the last 15 overs.
If you want a 30 ball 40, Jayasuriya is the man, He can bowl, and one of the elite filders too. Jayasuriya + Dhoni is a better player combination than Gilchrist + some middle order bat on face value.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
You should have watched the supertest in 2006, the way Boucher behind the wicket, was struggling against Murali. Missed few stumping chance or two because he simply could not read Murali. And that is exactly how he played too. Mow to the leg on length.
They should've picked McCullum in the SuperTest. He was named in the original squad and was a much better keeper than Boucher.
 

Migara

International Coach
They should've picked McCullum in the SuperTest. He was named in the original squad and was a much better keeper than Boucher.
Sangakkara was there, and kept superbly in ODIs. He should have kept in tests too. Way better bat than Boucher or McCullum.
 

Adorable Asshole

International Regular
If you want a 30 ball 40, Jayasuriya is the man, He can bowl, and one of the elite filders too. Jayasuriya + Dhoni is a better player combination than Gilchrist + some middle order bat on face value.
gilchrist + flintoff looks tempting solves the 5th bowler problem also

Gilchrist *
Sachin
Viv (c)
Kohli
ABD
Flintoff
Kluesner
Pollock
Akram
Garner
Murali/Warne

Better than any other ATG XI combos anyone can think of.

Could bat till 9. Still undecided on whether Warne batting could mke up for Murali's slightly better bowling.
 

weeman27bob

International Vice-Captain
gilchrist + flintoff looks tempting solves the 5th bowler problem also

Gilchrist *
Sachin
Viv (c)
Kohli
ABD
Flintoff
Kluesner
Pollock
Akram
Garner
Murali/Warne

Better than any other ATG XI combos anyone can think of.

Could bat till 9. Still undecided on whether Warne batting could mke up for Murali's slightly better bowling.
Have you not seen that you've got Garnet at 10?
 

Top