subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
I don't want to live rent-free in your brain. Please let me out and I will find a flat somewhere else.You mean like every post of his?
I don't want to live rent-free in your brain. Please let me out and I will find a flat somewhere else.You mean like every post of his?
So the claim was that Sehwag would score a hundred against Marshall's WI, I rebutted, and then the counterargument was that Inzi couldnt and then I rebutted. I agree overall record is more important.One or two hundreds against attacks that contain great bowlers prove **** all imo. Unless they are genuinely excellent innings in the match context. Lots of mediocre batsmen have had good days against great bowlers. Mathew Sinclair has a 150 vs Donald and Pollock ffs.
If you want to compare players go with the more reliable arguments like sehwag's poor overseas record or inzi's striking difference between 90s and 2000s averages. Not using solitary innings without context as some kind of gotcha .
No the initial claim was you saying Sehwag's chances of getting a hundred against Marshall in WI would be nil. Which is nonsensical. The following batsmen managed that immense feat of scoring a hundred against Marshall in WI:So the claim was that Sehwag would score a hundred against Marshall's WI, I rebutted, and then the counterargument was that Inzi couldnt and then I rebutted. I agree overall record is more important.
Daily reminder that Jeff Crowe > Sehwag.No the initial claim was you saying Sehwag's chances of getting a hundred against Marshall in WI would be nil. Which is nonsensical. The following batsmen managed that immense feat of scoring a hundred against Marshall in WI:
Wayne Phillips
Jeff Crowe
Sanjay Manjrekar
Ravi Shastri (twice)
Yeah, I think Sehwag might've managed it just fine with a few chances.
West Indian bowling attack of 80s and 90s was tailormade for Sehwag. Playing against pace was his strength. Just look how he used to murder Shoaib and Lee.So the claim was that Sehwag would score a hundred against Marshall's WI, I rebutted, and then the counterargument was that Inzi couldnt and then I rebutted. I agree overall record is more important.
I didnt talk about his weaknesses?Well done to subshakerz for ensuring Sehwag wins the poll by ignoring Sehwag's actual weaknesses and zeroing in on a fake one.
Yeah like he murdered Steyn in SA.West Indian bowling attack of 80s and 90s was tailormade for Sehwag. Playing against pace was his strength. Just look how he used to murder Shoaib and Lee.
Marshall and co. as in the entire WI quartet.No the initial claim was you saying Sehwag's chances of getting a hundred against Marshall in WI would be nil. Which is nonsensical. The following batsmen managed that immense feat of scoring a hundred against Marshall in WI:
Wayne Phillips
Jeff Crowe
Sanjay Manjrekar
Ravi Shastri (twice)
Yeah, I think Sehwag might've managed it just fine with a few chances.
Oh the irony...But let's let this topic rest pls.
23 in ODI in 80s with SR of 95 at batting position 7 is as good as batting average of 30 in Test as middle order bat .Daily reminder that 30 > 23.
Sehwag has no chance against Marshall is certainly a decent thread.I am triggered by you losing your head and acting like a child. This was a decent enough thread before you and Sunilz started with the lolololol Subshakerz posting. It's annoying to see everywhere even though it's pleasing when he ignores the tantrums.
How about Inzi against McGrath in 99?Sehwag has no chance against Marshall is certainly a decent thread.
Then pointing Inzamam actual average against McGrath in 04/05 is also decent. Don’t get triggered when we reply to him in his posting style.
Don’t get triggered when we reply to him in his posting style.
Nuclear race baiting Sunilz is almost always cancer, especially in these threads. Waaah someone said my guy wouldn't do well in an ATG scenario on a cricket forum I'll show him.This is the point. You're not giving it back, you're overcorrecting for an imagined offence and bringing every thread into the pits. I was triggered more by Sunilz's rancid bait than anything else. But c'mon.
Its funny you see that and yet you do not see the causeNuclear race baiting Sunilz is almost always cancer, especially in these threads. Waaah someone said my guy wouldn't do well in an ATG scenario on a cricket forum I'll show him.
Rating Kapil over Waqar deserves troll Sunilz way more than rating Inzi over Sehwag.Its funny you see that and yet you do not see the cause
Yeah he will keep making outrageous post and we will keep correcting him as if he is a school boy and we are his school teachers . Maybe you can ask your fellow Pakistani to stop making outrageous post about different cricketers.Nuclear race baiting Sunilz is almost always cancer, especially in these threads. Waaah someone said my guy wouldn't do well in an ATG scenario on a cricket forum I'll show him.
You could just point out the flaw in his logic.. by pointing out the flaw in his logic. You guys are just lightweights with a victim complex; this isn't even a tenth as out there as Steyn sucking in England.
What fresh hell do I have coming to me for Hoggard > Lillee?Rating Kapil over Waqar deserves troll Sunilz way more than rating Inzi over Sehwag.