Virender Sehwag vs Inzamam-ul-Haq

[honestbharani]

I am triggered by you losing your head and acting like a child. This was a decent enough thread before you and Sunilz started with the lolololol Subshakerz posting. It's annoying to see everywhere even though it's pleasing when he ignores the tantrums.

Its funny that you are triggered by the effect and not by the cause.

 

[trundler]

Its funny that you are triggered by the effect and not by the cause.

The cause is you attributing a level of rankness to him in your head then stooping to it.

 

[honestbharani]

The cause is you attributing a level of rankness to him in your head then stooping to it.

Nah, the cause is his posting.

 

[Prince EWS]

Nah, the cause is his posting.

And your face.

 

[honestbharani]

Its funny @trundler is so annoyed when it literally took me all of 3 posts to get him to respond the way most posters respond here, with reason, to saltshakerz.

When literally every page of every thread in CC is full of the same crap, I think it is fair enough to give it back.

 

[OverratedSanity]

The reason solitary innings came up was because people claimed Sehwag was literally incapable of ever scoring a ton against good bowlers in certain conditions.

Yes that's what I was getting at. Tons of mediocre 90s batsmen had good days against great bowlers. Anyone who followed cricket during that era should undrestand it's a ridiculous claim.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Its funny @trundler is so annoyed when it literally took me all of 3 posts to get him to respond the way most posters respond here, with reason, to saltshakerz.

When literally every page of every thread in CC is full of the same crap, I think it is fair enough to give it back.

I was far more triggered by you claiming Kapil and Botham were arguably better bowlers than Waqar. Far more ridiculous than anything subshakerz has said here.

 

[honestbharani]

I was far more triggered by you claiming Kapil and Botham were arguably better bowlers than Waqar. Far more ridiculous than anything subshakerz has said here.

Hmmm... interesting.

 

[trundler]

I think it is fair enough to give it back

This is the point. You're not giving it back, you're overcorrecting for an imagined offence and bringing every thread into the pits. I was triggered more by Sunilz's rancid bait than anything else. But c'mon.

 

[honestbharani]

This is the point. You're not giving it back, you're overcorrecting for an imagined offence and bringing every thread into the pits. I was triggered more by Sunilz's rancid bait than anything else. But c'mon.

You can literally read every thread.

 

[honestbharani]

I also wonder what is more rancid bait here?

sunilz posting actual facts or saltshakerz stubbornly refusing to acknowledge reality and doubling down on his obviously biased takes?

 

[Prince EWS]

I also wonder what is more rancid bait here?

sunilz posting actual facts or saltshakerz stubbornly refusing to acknowledge reality and doubling down on his obviously biased takes?

Yesss the "facts" are back!

 

[OverratedSanity]

Interesting question here would be how Inzi would've coped with conditions in overseas conditions if he was made to open. And how would Sehwag have done overseas if he'd got to bat at 4 and 5 (like he should've done). It's very likely Sehwag's overseas record gets better and Inzi's significantly worse. So you definitely can't compare their records on the surface easily. In reality Inzi was a better overseas performer, but a lot of it is just circumstances. Batting 1-3 is such a different proposition in those countries.

 

[honestbharani]

Yesss the "facts" are back!

They are always there. You just gotta see them.

 

[Prince EWS]

They are always there. You just gotta see them.

Everything I agree with is a fact.

Everything I disagree with is stubbornly refusing to acknowledge reality and doubling down on obviously biased takes.

 

[honestbharani]

Everything I agree with is a fact.

Everything I disagree with is stubbornly refusing to acknowledge reality and doubling down on obviously biased takes.

Nah, everything that is real is a fact. Everything you imagine coz you dont like soneone is the obviously biased takes you double down on.

 

[Prince EWS]

Everything you imagine coz you dont like soneone is the obviously biased takes you double down on.

Yeah like everything you imagine about subshakerz.

 

[subshakerz]

Nah Sehwag is better. Even without considering the opener brownie points. If you include ODIs, its obviously a different story.

Strangely enough I consider Sehwag better than Inzi in ODIs.

 

[honestbharani]

Yeah like everything you imagine about subshakerz.

You mean like every post of his?

 

[subshakerz]

No

Frankly Im surprised the poll is this tight. Inzi is a clearly better batsman.

The cult of Sehwag is strong in this forum