Pat Rafter a little like this, only he jagged the two US Opens. Made finals at the Aus and Wimbledon and semi finals at the French. By post-Newcombe Aus standards, he would have been held in huge regard had he won just one other non-US major.Henman’s record is quite poor aside from his three Wimbledon semi-finals. He had a decent year after he’d turned 30 where he reached the semi-final of the French and US Open in the same season, but aside from that he didn’t ever get beyond the 4th Round of the other Slams. A God by our standards pre-Murray, but not great globally.
He'd have a window in the early 90s, but mid 90s onwards he'd be competing with Kallis and Pollock.Kapil Dev also. If he had played from the 90s onward, he would have been hailed as the greatest all rounder off his time. But since he had to compete with Imran, Botham and Hadlee, he was never fully appreciated.
And if he'd come around before he did he'd have been behind Greig or earlier Sobers. Or Miller before them.He'd have a window in the early 90s, but mid 90s onwards he'd be competing with Kallis and Pollock.
Kapil was better than them chokers.He'd have a window in the early 90s, but mid 90s onwards he'd be competing with Kallis and Pollock.
In a different timeline he may have had some friends in Singapore.Tim David
Karpov wasn't so good that only being world champion for ten years was unfortunate. Caruana, meh.Apart from the sports or not debate.
Fabiano Caruana and Anatoly Karpov.
Karpov's matches against Kasparov were extremely close, there was little to separate the two but he isn't really considered anywhere near as good. Caruana I just mentioned because I think he is the strongest of a whole generation denied by Magnus.Karpov wasn't so good that only being world champion for ten years was unfortunate. Caruana, meh.
It's not, ftr. Fails the Hawking test.Apart from the sports or not debate.
Fabiano Caruana and Anatoly Karpov.
What's the Hawking test?It's not, ftr. Fails the Hawking test.
Pretty much, yeah. If the famously MND-stricken Prof Hawking could defeat one in a competition in the discipline it must be classed as a purely mental pastime, so cannot be correctly classified as a sport.What's the Hawking test?
(Guessing something can't be a sport if Hawking could have managed to do it?)
Dixon, Bould and Keown all good enough to play for England way more than they did too tbhI'm unashamedly biased, but Nigel Winterburn, internationally at least, has a case.
Had a very successful club career for the Arse. Since you asked he won 3 titles, 2 FA Cups a League Cup and a Cup-Winners Cup. ?
However 2 England caps was scant reward for a left-back of his undoubted class. Had the misfortune of the peak of his career coinciding with initially Kenny Samson (who he replaced at the Gooners but not for England), and then Stuart Pearce and Graeme Le Saux.
He also played at the same time as Tony Dorigo (an Australian with an Italian father who somehow found himself playing for England) who was inexplicably preferred as Pearce's deputy in the England squads of Italia 90 & Euro 92. We'll draw a veil over USA 94, but come Euro 96 he was omitted for Phil "****ing" Neville.
hmm, they just need to make the pieces heavy and it'll get there.Pretty much, yeah. If the famously MND-stricken Prof Hawking could defeat one in a competition in the discipline it must be classed as a purely mental pastime, so cannot be correctly classified as a sport.
Darts & snooker: sports; chess & poker: not sports.