h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
Two what ifs - who is better
AbsolutelyStarfighter you're the youngest grumpy old man on the planet
Nissar was quicker. Singh is usually considered the better bowler by the writers of the day, even though his stats are almost always worse. I reckon bowlers that weren't fast tended to get more favourable treatment then, like if those judging were a bunch of David Friths.Wasn't Mohammed Nissar a better/quicker bowler than Singh?
I thought Singh was held in high regard due to his all-round skills
Is there footage of Nissar? I saw that he’s playing in the same game but he doesn’t feature in those videos with the ball.
Cowie better than Amar Singh by a good margin.Both Hutton and Hammond rated Amar very very high. (Like best in the world kind of high)
There's nothing exceptional in his stats though and he barely played any tests. Bond is a seriously low bar though so Amar gets to be better by default. In fact I have recently learnt that actually playing tests has no relevance to being good so Amar is probably better than every NZ bowler bar Hadlee.