Plenty of bowlers have injuries or even just a prolonged loss of form. Need to wait until he reaches 300 wickets for me to begin to rate him to established ATGs.200 wickets is a decent sample provided no freak injury Cummins is guaranteed 350 wickets @ sub 24 average
But e’s already had an 11 year test career, as a pacer apparently you should be able to judge him on that, what happens after this point is of no concern in where he ends up in all time ratings.Plenty of bowlers have injuries or even just a prolonged loss of form. Need to wait until he reaches 300 wickets for me to begin to rate him to established ATGs.
He's not been active for 11 years. If he had played 60 odd tests with his current output, I would have him ahead of Garner and Holding and he's done enough to be on par with Davidson, who had a short career too.But e’s already had an 11 year test career, as a pacer apparently you should be able to judge him on that, what happens after this point is of no concern in where he ends up in all time ratings.
Nah he’s been playing tests since 2011, thats 11 years.He's not been active for 11 years. If he had played 60 odd tests with his current output, I would have him ahead of Garner and Holding and he's done enough to be on par with Davidson, who had a short career too.
You're really reaching to misrepresent me. I'd have Lindwall over Davidson any day previously because prettier averages aren't everything for me.Nah he’s been playing tests since 2011, thats 11 years.