Line and Length
Cricketer Of The Year
Verity then Underwood and Wardle
There is a relatively unknown Pakistani named Pervez Sajjad who averages 24 with the ball for 59 wickets. Anyone know about him?Rhodes and Wardle would be ahead of Lock in my rankings, for sure. Lock's overall average is very misleading. He took 47 wickets @ 7.80 against New Zealand who at that time were amongst the weakest Test sides ever seen. Against all the other sides, he took 127 wickets at 32.15. He averaged over 25 with a strike rate over 74 against every other side. Given the favourable era in which he played, when compared with contemporaries like Laker, Wardle and Appleyard who all averaged under 22, this is a relatively run of the mill bowling resume; despite what his overall average may suggest at first glance from a modern perspective.
Beating up on NZ in the 60s wasn't really impressive, ultimately.There is a relatively unknown Pakistani named Pervez Sajjad who averages 24 with the ball for 59 wickets. Anyone know about him?
Denis Compton, but at Test level he wasn't very effective (at bowling).Extra respect for Wardle bowling left-arm leg spin (formerly known as 'Chinaman' bowling) as well as orthodox SLAs. Have any other English test bowlers bowled left-arm leggies?
That's right. I forgot about Compton.Denis Compton, but at Test level he wasn't very effective (at bowling).
Verity’s average was 14.90, the lowest for any bowler with 1000 wickets since 1900, so I don’t think it’s that clear-cut.If it were about first class cricket Rhodes would win this by a mile