Charlie B
U19 Vice-Captain
Hi JJ - well the default way Stumped works for improving your skills is - it happens quicker when you're younger and slows up as you reach your potential as you knowWould be interested in the answer myself actually, Stumped website says the following - "Captaincy does not have a potential, but is slowly learnt on the job though remains a largely innate ability (or lack of)." That doesn't offer much in terms of an answer but would guess if it does improve more quickly from a low base it would only be slightly more quickly as there is no potential and its deemed to be a largely innate ability.
However captaincy could be a different kettle of fish!
Potentially everyone must be able to reach 20 (OR MAYBE NOT - I might have made a wrong assumption there - see later!) and it might be that you need to say be captain in 10 matches to move your skill by 1 so 200 matches to move from 0 to 20. However maybe someone has innate captaincy ability to they only need 100 matches to reach it whilst someone else would need 500 ????
However, i don't think this would mirror cricketing reality - i reckon your marginal ability to learn more on captaincy tails off with each match in real life - (ie you will learn a whole lot more in your 0-10th captaincy matches than in your 190th - 200th - so on that basis i reckon it would be fair if it follows the other skill patterns
It might also be reality that a 17 year old learns captaincy quicker than a 28 year old who is rather set in his ways. Devils advocate though would say a 28 year old has so much general experience that he can pick up captaincy much quicker than a newby with no experience
So i got us no further at all on that one ! lol
You say the rules say captaincy does not have potential - but i dont even know what that is trying to tell us. I mean everyone's potentail is 20 isnt it??? or is it saying that there is a glass celing that si diiferent for everyone. Smith (16 yrs 0 weeks) starts as 3 and so does Jones (same age) but if you gave then 100 matches each of the same type and length Smith reaches 17 but Jones is on 11 it is not clear without a potential if there is just a uniform or unique mechanism for captaincy development
I suppsoe i could go back and look waht captaincy level each of my players began with; at what age and then see what it is now ( capatincy level and age) and then see how many matches and what type they have played to start to get some actual 'data' but omg - thats a lot of le work for such a minor question!!!
Last edited: