Surely Dave Warner and Graeme Smith are well ahead of these guys, although admittedly Smith only played for about half the decade. Tamim Iqbal at a similar level also.to me this is the race for the second best opener of the tens behind cook… and i often jump between the three
Rajendra ChandrikaWho is the better test match opener?
None of them are good enough to carry Dave Warner's jockstrapto me this is the race for the second best opener of the tens behind cook… and i often jump between the three
Kiwi brahs will be madDefinitely not Latham lmao
Nah they are well aware that he's not actually good in proper circketKiwi brahs will be mad
Flem got reeealy mad once though.Nah they are well aware that he's not actually good in proper circket
That's like saying my water was wet this one timeFlem got reeealy mad once though.
About someone dissing Latham? Unlikely. His average is fraudulent.Flem got reeealy mad once though.
Actually it's about him being good/not good against spinAbout someone dissing Latham? Unlikely. His average is fraudulent.
Scored some runs in Asia/UAE. He's decent.Actually it's about him being good/not good against spin
No, we won't. Unless it is against a minnow he should be against Nicholls, Phillips to bat 5 in the test team.Kiwi brahs will be mad
yeah i can't count smith given the time he played and re warner his constant failures in india and england (the tours that matter most for a touring oz team) are to me a huge minusSurely Dave Warner and Graeme Smith are well ahead of these guys, although admittedly Smith only played for about half the decade. Tamim Iqbal at a similar level also.
This is typical CricketChat, rating consistent mediocrity over Warner who is ATG-level in more than half the games he playsyeah i can't count smith given the time he played and re warner his constant failures in india and england (the tours that matter most for a touring oz team) are to me a huge minus
cc @GIMH it's not just joe root who this standard is applied to