This occurs a lot in all decade teams, due to players who may have only played a half decade having clearly superior records to others who played the whole decade. It depends what you think is more important, players who were playing the whole decade or the highest skill level of players who played in that decade.Don't seem like the consistent best options beyond home grounds and peaks, and some of them didn't play most of the decade involved.
Considering England were probably only the 5th or 6th best team of the decade it seems excessive to have five of their players in the team.2011 – 2020
Aliaster Cook
David Warner
Steven Smith
Kumara Sangakkara
Joe Root
A.B devilliers
Ben Stokes
Ravi Ashwin
Mitchell Johnson
Stuart Broad
James Anderson
ABD was a fine keeper and averaged 57 in that role I believe.De Villiers keeping is cheating and that's not a team for the 00s.
Stokes has a perfectly fine caseConsidering England were probably only the 5th or 6th best team of the decade it seems excessive to have five of their players in the team.
5 from England!, 3 from Australia, and one each from India, SA, and SL. Yes to Cook and Anderson. No to the rest.
Yes, but so do many others. We could play six soecialist batsmen as there many elite players who missed out, but Watling as 7 instead of Stokes.Stokes has a perfectly fine case
Bruce Mitchell in the '30s.1940s
Hutton
Morris
Bradman(C)
Compton
Harvey/Nourse
Weekes
Miller
Tallon+
Lindwall
Johnston
Bedser
1930s
Sutcliffe
Hutton
Bradman(C)
Hammond
Headley
Nourse
McCabe/Cowie
Ames+
Verity
Larwood
O’Reilly
1920s
Hobbs
Sutcliffe
Hammond
McCarthy
Woolley
Hendren
Gregory
Tate
Oldfield+
Mcdonald
Grimmett