honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
you ****.f no volunteers / several volunteers, the lowest ranked side sits out
you ****.f no volunteers / several volunteers, the lowest ranked side sits out
You aren't the lowest ranked @honestbharaniyou ****.
Dev rankings lol. I love it this way tbh - hope AX-W get into top half of draw.
Overall Ranking
CWC Ranking
Team Name 12 1 The Merry Orangutans 13 2 Charminster CC 14 3 Jura CC 34 4 Dynamo Schmaltzberg 54 5 Moooo 55 6 GG CC 57 7 Ashgrove Astronauts 72 8 The Wild Geese 75 9 Zor*x CC 79 10 Free HK 93 11 AtaraX Wellington 96 12 Winton CC 117 13 AtaraXIa 134 14 Honest Hunks 158 15 Dynamo Morpork 173 16 Plymouth Pirates 201 17 The Net Theorists
Will do it based on seedings at the time of the draw but if rankings remain the same - could throw up some very interesting groups, Free HK and Zor*x CC as 3rd seeds, Dynamo Morpork and Ataraxia as 4th seeds.
Also at time of doing draw I'll keep affiliates seperated, I'll put teams drawn in 1st available group that doesn't have their affilate in.
Quite a start to that game, 3 for 1 in 2.2 overs@SillyCowCorner1 thank you for the thrashing today by GGCC on TNT... at least I walked away with money, pushing me over the $1M.
Player normally has the Iceman trait... indicating he is a cool customer in a pressure situation! What it means in practice for stumped only the Devs know!Hi Guys - what does ' Anyname is keeping cool under pressure' mean when a guy is bowling (and stated before he has even bowled his first ball!) thanks
You are totally right - he is indeed an Iceman!Player normally has the Iceman trait... indicating he is a cool customer in a pressure situation! What it means in practice for stumped only the Devs know!
I've quoted the above so people can look over it if they have not already done so. To clear up a couple of areas that have been discussed since idea posed.So I`m gonna suggest a different format. 16 teams (I`m happy for TNT to drop out).
4 groups of 4 round robin (based on current dev rankings), home and away. Played quickly we can have 3 matches a week be done in two weeks. Top two from each group then move into a 8 player round robin. Bottom 2 from groups move into a lower bracket round robin. This means that the strongest and weakest teams are mostly separated early and there is a more competitive group 8 stage round robin. We can slow that down to two matches a week?
We can then have top four from top of group 8 stage straight into semi-finals. Else we can have the number 3 and 4 in 'top' group play against 1 and 2 in second group and that can decide semis against the top two from group 1 (similar to this last season). The second might be worth it because dev teams change over the season! It depends if you want it to be about long term success or team success at that point!
I also don't think we play matches (unless people really want to!) for 13th and 14th place etc. I understand it is meant to be inclusive. But if you have an eliminator matches, semi's and final's (possibly 3rd/4th) can be done quickly without having all these other games going on that people are less interested in. Its not like stumped stops and people are not involved in other tournaments. (Or just need a break!). It should just not drag.
Its a classic sort of format but the classics work!
All good with me - thank youUnless there is any dissenting voices I'll set competition up on Saturday evening UK time and give a week or so for people to join respective Divs.
I've quoted the above so people can look over it if they have not already done so. To clear up a couple of areas that have been discussed since idea posed.
* There will be 'Traditional' semi-finals, 1st v 4th, 2nd v 3rd.
* There will be no cross-over between top and 2nd division after initial 4 groups of 4 round robin. So top 4 of 2nd div will go into 2nd div semi-finals and top 4 of Top div will go into the top div semi-finals.
I'm presuming given no one has mentioned it everyone is happy with 3 matches a week for initial round-robin and 2 matches a week thereafter.
@cnerd123 @Charlie B @JOJOXI @Jarquis @Magrat Garlick @StephenZA @honestbharani @ataraxia @SillyCowCorner1
Dynamo Morpork putting out teams of 42/43k match ratings in recent DEV games so seems like they are a bit out of position re their ranking. Looking like it'll be a high quality group!Am I wrong in saying Group D seems like the group of death?
Yeah I had presumed given the force your sides normally are in CWC that your Zor*x side would be stronger, I went a bit too strong with my line-up for our recent DEV friendly in hindsight.seriously tempted to sign on a few CWC specialists for ZCC. Our current squad is crap lol.
View attachment 32995
Testing out CWC6 combinations. Daylight between the two sides.