nzfan
International Vice-Captain
How so? Our next test assignment is vs Pakistan in Pakistan I think. He will play every test even if he doesn't feature in the next one.Ajaz is never getting another test and you'd be wise to accept that.
How so? Our next test assignment is vs Pakistan in Pakistan I think. He will play every test even if he doesn't feature in the next one.Ajaz is never getting another test and you'd be wise to accept that.
Kane for Nicholls, Bracewell still at 7.Cooper = KW. He's in the red room already. The KW we're seeing right now is really evil-Kane, working at failing so bad overseas so that every sub-continent poster chuckle-head can titter to themselves about his away record.
Neither will happen. Bracewell will play and bat at 8 - NZ will want the extra batting cover with Jamieson out of the side. Even with a well-performing middle-order, having Wagner or Southee coming out to bat at 8 with Ajaz at 10 looks a little thin.
As for Latham, I think everyone's point is that this is his usual form against serious opponents. I like Latham a lot, I think he's underrated. But his batting has stagnated at the level of "acceptable for NZ".
I have us at close to 100% certain to lose this test. We don't win tests from this position and the current team is in shambles - it's bigger than the individual players, who you correctly assess as being perfectly acceptable. Let's hope I'm wrong and reassess in about 16 hours.Last test match?
Any rational objective critic should rightly point out KW's ordinary away records in India, England & SA if he's being compared with the great batsmen if his era.Cooper = KW. He's in the red room already. The KW we're seeing right now is really evil-Kane, working at failing so bad overseas so that every sub-continent poster chuckle-head can titter to themselves about his away record.
I was worried for our bowling particularly the lot coming from IPL but they have done all right. Jamieson is a huge loss. Strange things happen you never know. Just hoping Southee doesn't bowl unchanged 40 overs from one end even if he is not getting wickets. Wish they do use Bracewell to bowl at least 15-20 overs. Last day pitch and a dry one, there's definitely bound to be some purchase.I have us at close to 100% certain to lose this test. We don't win tests from this position and the current team is in shambles - it's bigger than the individual players, who you correctly assess as being perfectly acceptable. Let's hope I'm wrong and reassess in about 16 hours.
Unfortunately the tradesmen (coaches) appear to be tools sometimes.We have the right tools (players) for the job but wrong tradesmen (coaches) imo.
SA's a curious inclusion. He's played literally 1 test there since he was 22. Scored a good 70-something in that game too iirc.Any rational objective critic should rightly point out KW's ordinary away records in India, England & SA if he's being compared with the great batsmen if his era.
The way England are at the moment they will either canter home with epic Root-Stokes knocks or fold for 85I'm feeling strangely optimistic about our chances. If we can eek out another 30-40 runs, setting England 275 off 75 overs, we're an odds-on chance.
I was going to say this is harsh on Nicholls considering he scored a century vs SA not too long ago but looing at the stats post-India tour he is the worst performing middle order bat of the current lot - though averages more than Young and Latham in the same period (who have tougher jobs).Kane for Nicholls, Bracewell still at 7.
3 fast bowlers (Boult, Southee, Wagner/Henry) and Ajaz. Perfect balance. More than enough batting particularly with Darryl and Blundell in best form of their lives.
It'll be an absolute disaster if they also mess around with Young. Finally we have someone who's a really good player. Not like a scrapper but a good player. It will do no good to his psyche if they drop him. Got to give him a good run.I was going to say this is harsh on Nicholls considering he scored a century vs SA not too long ago but looing at the stats post-India tour he is the worst performing middle order bat of the current lot - though averages more than Young and Latham in the same period (who have tougher jobs).
Latham's stats are inflated by his double. I know the "take away his good scores is daft" rationale is that - daft - but that's his 1 50+ score of the entire period. His next highest score was in this match, of 26. Meanwhile Young has passed 50 4 times in the same period.
I know the "make middle order bat open" strategy is daft but if it's anyone it should be Nicholls. He's a scrapper with 9 lives, should take advantage.It'll be an absolute disaster if they also mess around with Young. Finally we have someone who's a really good player. Not like a scrapper but a good player. It will do no good to his psyche if they drop him. Got to give him a good run.
are you really saying he was dropped because he's a left winger?Neesham is different in his outlook.
Don't know but I can't see how they could have cut from the contract. At the batting order he plays and the number of overs he bowls he's not done bad that I know of. If it's not performance it has to be something else right?are you really saying he was dropped because he's a left winger?