StephenZA
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Need to give Smith as much catching practice as possible...why Aussies not set 400 target it more secure
Need to give Smith as much catching practice as possible...why Aussies not set 400 target it more secure
It's not a reflex thing. It's a hell of an effort that he's getting to some of these in all from how poorly he's set himself up.Yeah nah something is genuinely up with Smith's reflex's, when he was getting worked out by Wagner he was still reliable at slip, been a liability since the India series. Don't think we'll ever see pre-covid Smith again.
Slog after getting to 350 and get to 400.What do you wan them to do ffs?
He's going the wrong way entirely on some of theseIt's not a reflex thing. It's a hell of an effort that he's getting to some of these in all from how poorly he's set himself up.
It's entirely technical. Poor reflexes don't explain why he's getting up so early.
Yeah unfortunately he's still at 7 in the second innings.Haha, not again
Yeah, but that's also related to coming up too quickly.He's going the wrong way entirely on some of these
Maybe. But it also could be a case of compensating for diminished reflexes where he's trying to pre empt where to go instead of relying on last second reflexes. Not sure I buy that his reflexes have suddenly gone tho.Yeah, but that's also related to coming up too quickly.
Bat for 30 more minutes, get 30-40 more runs and take Pakistan victory substantially out of the equation. Not a bad trade off for batting additional 30 minutes.Lol
Mate they’ve set a tough target and declared three down to do it. If they don’t get a result so
be it but I’d rather this than batting into tomorrow and guaranteeing no result as an option. What do you wan them to do ffs?
yeah agree, Australia would be absolutely filthy with themselves if they lose this series after the way second and third test have gone - and it's a genuine possibility right now.Slog after getting to 350 and get to 400.
If they set say 400 with 110 overs it would've made an Australian win less likely, but perhaps going from 60% to 55%. In contrast it would've been like a 5% chance at the very most that Pakistan pull off a miracle. I think 350 in 120 you would've given Pakistan a 20% chance of winning.
I was being hyperbolic with my last sentence for extreme measure, but the first thing you should do while setting a declaration is "what position would have the largest percentage gap between my team winning and the opposition winning". As it is, I don't think Cummins did that and it could cost him in the worst way possible.
Yeah, the bounce is inconsistent now, Starc and Cummins are moments away from reverse swing these days....but if Pakistan can apply themselves and take it step by step, no reason why they can't get 280 odd in a day's worth of cricket.I would have batted for another 4 or 5 overs as well but 280 is a big score to get on the last day on a wearing pitch that is behaving inconsistently. Pakistan have started well but they've had a healthy slice of luck so far and Aus ought to feel confident. Swepson bowling T20 darts instead of actual leg breaks is the only real concern.
that's not how it works, you need to subtract exactly the difference of averages + 0.01 to the guy you are comparing them to.Remember to subtract 5 off every Australian bowler's average because of the catching.