OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Maybe he thinks we didn't zahear him the first timeMate it wasn't funny the first time. No need to repeat yourself.
Maybe he thinks we didn't zahear him the first timeMate it wasn't funny the first time. No need to repeat yourself.
I still khan't zahear him.Maybe he thinks we didn't zahear him the first time
I m ran out of here with such posts.I still khan't zahear him.
Yeah...but what does he do outside of the IPL?The WC winner lives in Mumbai and is the Director of Cricket with Mumbai Indians.
There is nothing outside of the IPL mate.Yeah...but what does he do outside of the IPL?
4 wickets per matchYeah that's what I meant. Sobers's peak 7-8 year period was as close to AR perfection as we've ever gotten. 70 with bat and 27 with ball, taking 3 wickets per match and scoring a ton every 3 games. Or something similarly crazy like that. That level of output over so long is just unmatched. That's about as good a batting peak as there has ever been whilst genuinely being a world class bowler. No flattering lower order boosted average or pretty looking average without the volume of wickets for it to matter either.
Answer is obvious, because Rhodes was yet to born when Grace was Bradman Pro Max.Here is Wilfred Rhodes opinion of the best batsman he ever saw:
View attachment 31170
The obvious answer, but a very well argued analysis, IMO.
This takes me back to the 12th grade in school where we had a topic like inductive deduction or deductive induction whatever. We already know what we need to prove but just need to find the mathematical formula to solve it.Actually its very easy equation
Sobers batting + bowling = Bradman batting
Bradman batting = WG batting
WG batting = Sobers batting + bowling
Sobers = WG minus Bowling
Hence proved WG clearly better.
Mate, all I remember about 12th Std was to ensure you write 10 lines of working out some equation with whatever crap you want but suddenly around the 9th step, LHS starts becoming the same as RHS and the 10th line is when they are equal and the 11th line is "Hence Proved". That seemed to get marks everytime.This takes me back to the 12th grade in school where we had a topic like inductive deduction or deductive induction whatever. We already know what we need to prove but just need to find the mathematical formula to solve it.
Actually its very easy equation
Sobers batting + bowling = Bradman batting
Bradman batting = WG batting
WG batting = Sobers batting + bowling
Sobers = WG minus Bowling
Hence proved WG clearly better.
That's not so bad tbh. We always forget WG's bowling when we talk about rating him. He was an all rounder for all intents and purposes. He took more fivers than he scored hundreds!Actually its very easy equation
Sobers batting + bowling = Bradman batting
Bradman batting = WG batting
WG batting = Sobers batting + bowling
Sobers = WG minus Bowling
Hence proved WG clearly better.