CricAddict
Cricketer Of The Year
Yet to be dismissed in Pakistan as well ?hasn't taken a single wicket in pakistan tbqh
Yet to be dismissed in Pakistan as well ?hasn't taken a single wicket in pakistan tbqh
Wanted to say neither has Cummins but dumb Pak team lost one of their 4 to him. Soz............hasn't taken a single wicket in pakistan tbqh
I love Jadeja - as I said a few posts ago I think he's a great of the game - but I think there are a few factors that kind of inflate his stats a bit. He's an absolute gun but he's not actually 36/24 gun.what holes can you pick in his record to downgrade him on?
Those are all true to varying degrees but so is the fact that he has had great stats when rest of the Indian batting have been horrible and that matters as much, if not more, than all of those factors.I love Jadeja - as I said a few posts ago I think he's a great of the game - but I think there are a few factors that kind of inflate his stats a bit. He's an absolute gun but he's not actually 36/24 gun.
- Plays 60% of his Tests at home
- Home conditions very well suited to the type of player he is
- Regularly left out when conditions aren't in his favour (although a bit less so lately)
- Recent batting average not really reflective of his actual impact/value on matches given he usually bats around 7
Averages 25.94 with the bat and 43.26 with the ball in England.what holes can you pick in his record to downgrade him on?
I actually expected it to be worse. For a bad record to be hand-picked, it is actually not that terrible imo compared to the bad records of few other atgs.Averages 25.94 with the bat and 43.26 with the ball in England.
Stopped reading after but. Nothing good comes after but.I love Jadeja - as I said a few posts ago I think he's a great of the game - but I think there are a few factors that kind of inflate his stats a bit. He's an absolute gun but he's not actually 36/24 gun.
- Plays 60% of his Tests at home
- Home conditions very well suited to the type of player he is
- Regularly left out when conditions aren't in his favour (although a bit less so lately)
- Recent batting average not really reflective of his actual impact/value on matches given he usually bats around 7
he's taken 171/241 wickets in India I guesswhat holes can you pick in his record to downgrade him on?
That's what she said.Nothing good comes after but.
I mostly agree but the "left out when conditions don't suit" point is brought up for both ashwin and Jadeja. They're just left out for each other so I'm not sure it's a stick I'd use to hit both. Feels unfair.I love Jadeja - as I said a few posts ago I think he's a great of the game - but I think there are a few factors that kind of inflate his stats a bit. He's an absolute gun but he's not actually 36/24 gun.
- Plays 60% of his Tests at home
- Home conditions very well suited to the type of player he is
- Regularly left out when conditions aren't in his favour (although a bit less so lately)
- Recent batting average not really reflective of his actual impact/value on matches given he usually bats around 7
There are still people who think he shouldn't be in the LO and/or test teams in specific conditions etc. He should be the second or third name on the sheet after Pant and possibly Rohit.Not a chance he’s the most underrated cricketer anymore
Yeah I'm not saying the very fact that he doesn't always play is actually a black mark against him; I was just pointing out that it helps his averages a bit.I mostly agree but the "left out when conditions don't suit" point is brought up for both ashwin and Jadeja. They're just left out for each other so I'm not sure it's a stick I'd use to hit both. Feels unfair.
Even Warne and Murali would be occasionally dropped if they were both in the same team.
And Imran Khan and Kapil Dev aren't on it at all and Botham, Kallis and Hadlee are on it only once. Chris Cairns is on it twice, as is Steve Waugh.However, one game doesn't equate to ATG. Garfield Sobers appears on that list 6 times (and Mushtaq Mohammad 3 times).
True - but the dropping thing is valid for pre 2019/2020 or whatever. Since then he's only been injured, not dropped. And we really should have been playing him more since he started hitting form some time in 2016. Obviously maybe not immediately, but certainly since 2017 or so.Yeah I'm not saying the very fact that he doesn't always play is actually a black mark against him; I was just pointing out that it helps his averages a bit.
If Warne and Murali were both in the same team they'd likely both have better bowling averages due to occasionally being dropped when conditions weren't going to suit them.
Yeah I think that's true as well, but if he hadn't been injured and had been selected more etc I think he'd probably have a slightly worse overall record due to which games he's actually missed.And we really should have been playing him more since he started hitting form some time in 2016. Obviously maybe not immediately, but certainly since 2017 or so.
It means Sobers is a cut above all other great all-rounders.So this means what?
His bowling (away) might have been worse but his away record would have improved I think. He's been a very good bat for a while now - and as per other thread, averaging 30-something is massive these days. Especially since we've had a bunch of people taking up spots averaging in the 20s for a while.Yeah I think that's true as well, but if he hadn't been injured and had been selected more etc I think he'd probably have a slightly worse overall record due to which games he's actually missed.
Haven't checked it but what did the windies 80s team do on spinning pitches? Did they still play all of Marshall holding Roberts and Garner?I mostly agree but the "left out when conditions don't suit" point is brought up for both ashwin and Jadeja. They're just left out for each other so I'm not sure it's a stick I'd use to hit both. Feels unfair.
Even Warne and Murali would be occasionally dropped if they were both in the same team.