• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* South Africa in New Zealand 2022

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Excellent from SA. They are missing Nortje & Ngidi who I thought was excellent in last series. If their entire bowling attack stays fit, We would have a interesting Australia series this year.
NZ really made a blunder not to play Ajaz here. Maharaj has been brilliant to watch in this game.
Ajaz isn’t fit.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Ajaz isn’t fit.
Yeah if NZ were going to pick a spin option in this game I reckon it would've been Rachin for CdG... and I don't think anyone can really argue NZ would've been better off without Colin in this game.

Also worth noting that Maharaj has only taken 3 out of 14 wickets despite bowling beautifully, and SA batted first.

I think five seamers should be basically illegal but I don't think it's cost NZ here as much as some people seem to.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Yeah if NZ were going to pick a spin option in this game I reckon it would've been Rachin for CdG... and I don't think anyone can really argue NZ would've been better off without Colin in this game.

Also worth noting that Maharaj has only taken 3 out of 14 wickets despite bowling beautifully, and SA batted first.

I think five seamers should be basically illegal but I don't think it's cost NZ here as much as some people seem to.
yea, two legside edges and a dumb aerial cut shot have been far more costly than ravindra not playing, unless it is revealed in that alternate reality that will young played ahead of mitchell at 5 and scored 250.

didn't see today but i can't imagine being 25/3 was especially helpful either.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Also worth noting that Maharaj has only taken 3 out of 14 wickets despite bowling beautifully, and SA batted first.
What Maharaj brings to the attack is more what its about, rather than directly number of wickets he takes.

I think five seamers should be basically illegal but I don't think it's cost NZ here as much as some people seem to.
I don't quite understand why the NZ supporters are jumping on the spin bandwagon. My complaints (and the other SA supporters) have been the specific dropping of 'Maharaj' rather than not including a spinner... if you don't have a quality spinner then going with an all pace bowling attack is fine. But SA do have Maharaj and a quality seam all rounder, so why go in with a 5 man pace attack when you can have better balance? That was my complaint last Test match and in this match, much better selection from SA has resulted in better balance and options for Elgar.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I don't quite understand why the NZ supporters are jumping on the spin bandwagon. My complaints (and the other SA supporters) have been the specific dropping of 'Maharaj' rather than not including a spinner... if you don't have a quality spinner then going with an all pace bowling attack is fine. But SA do have Maharaj and a quality seam all rounder, so why go in with a 5 man pace attack when you can have better balance? That was my complaint last Test match and in this match, much better selection from SA has resulted in better balance and options for Elgar.
Most of their posts aren't really about your posts. They're allowed to make a separate point (even if I think they're wrong in this instance).
 

thundaboult

International Debutant
If we keep Sears in the queue for 2 or 3 years, I fear that it's more likely that he'll be turning out for the annual Chapman Tripp v Russell McVeagh Christmas match than for the Blackcaps.
oh I'm all more sears or even fisher getting a run, but surely lockie gets a call-up first if waggy goes
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
The sooner we dispense with the 'Will Young is a decent option as an opener' idea, the better. I like Will Young as a player, but he is not technically up to opening in Test match cricket. That ball yesterday, on 5th (at least) stump with no sideways movement, was a classic example. We know about the penchant for playing across his front pad to the ball coming in, too.

If Kane is out, open with Conway - you know, the guy who scored 200 on debut playing there. Bat Young at 3. Then when Kane returns, he bats 4 and allows Nicholls to bat in his rightful spot at 5 + start to transition the next opening partner for Latham into that spot (Rachin, no doubt). Otherwise we're going to get into a position where we shoehorn Young into a spot he's not up to, and we risk jeopardizing the career of a guy who could average 40+ at 4 but may get into a technical and mental glut having to open.
Steve your Will Young theory stands out like golden peaches at the moment.
Conway not opening in England in June would have to go down as almost comical.
think he could be an outstanding opening bat, besides what more compelling evidence is required when you score a double ton on foreign soil
in your test debut? sure this will weaken the 3/4 spots, but NZ need him here for at least this particular series.
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
Just wandering in general what true test cricket enthusiasts really think about this situation.
While most kiwis no doubt are hoping for as many world cup points as possible, as to qualify for the final, the question here is how much
relevance should be taken into achieving that goal?
In essence, are we playing years of test series, all aimed at making a final for a one off shootout?
Looking back at scorecards in years to come, would personally rather see NZ win their first ever test series against South Africa 1-0,
as opposed to 1-1 because we played to aggressively trying to make it 2-0 so we got more brownie points.
the difference between 1-0 or 2-0 doesn't really matter, assuming the goal was to win the series.
for these reasons I strongly believe that NZ should go all out(not literally)and play their lives out for the DRAW.
it's time to go STONEWALL, and leave anything possible(Tom if your reading, that doesn't necessarily mean the straight ones)
CDG will still have to play some natural shots, but even he'll be required for many a dot ball.
7 batsman have a chance to star in some way or another and create some history, but it's a determined team effort that's required from here.
roll the clock back just 2 months and NZ pulled off an inspired display of survival in India, surely this pitch and these conditions no worse than then?
market at stumps:
SA 1.16
NZ 34/1
draw 9/1
 

WpGuy

U19 Cricketer
van der Dussen had a nice few minutes against Wagner but I would drop him as well. Just because Bavuma averages sub-35, the rest of the middle order can't. Not going to win many test matches with those middling stats.
Yah Van Tonder/Hamza etc , Elgar,Erwee, Bavuma,Vernenynne,mulder entrenched in top 7 for now and petersen so 1 place open then...
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
Meh love the over reaction from nz fans, saf have had all the luck in this test after having none in the first. At least we now can move on from the young open experiment and pick a specialist, he's done or at least needs a spell. Nz will win comfortably without a spinner in England and all will be forgotten.
Is it overreaction? And will we win in England?

There's holes in this side. The selection of Young as an opener is a misstep. Latham can't score runs v top 6 opposition. Kane is injured a lot. Ross is gone. Blundell is unreliable. Jamieson has hit a flat patch. We can't rely on CdG's bowling potentially as much as in the past. Wagner is down 6-8km. We're not the side we were last year or 2-3 years ago.

And SAF having all the luck seems to be me to be bunkum. They played far better cricket. Both teams got to do what they wanted at the toss, and SA were especially noteworthy in batting and making it count. They've exposed us a little bit. They've knocked over our top order twice cheaply, and our bowling plans have looked average when we can't take wickets up front and Wagner can't bounce them out any more.
 

WpGuy

U19 Cricketer
I know exactly how special Maharaj is... it was is exactly his bread and butter and it’s why I keep getting pissed off ever time we drop him for “insert stupid reason here”. Particularly when we have a genuinely good number 7 all rounder. ....

Anyway I’ve beaten this poor horse too many times...
You have been proven right well done! :)
 

WpGuy

U19 Cricketer
You might know better through domestix but Mulder has done nothing so far at international level to be termed as genuinely good.
Averages like 50 with the bat and mid to late 20s with ball, he is a batting allrounder at all levels below int cricket so far int cricket stats don't show it yet but maybe like kallis time will prove it.
 

Top