subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Roberts higher in peer rating plus slightly better stats wise.Walsh.
Why is Roberts better than Anderson ftr?
I think the problem with Anderson is that bowlers normally have their reputation and standing pretty much cemented by the time they reach around 250/300 wickets. Hence why Wasim was still a top choice despite slowly down quite a bit in his latter years while late bloomers like Walsh were still rated around the same by the end of their career.