5th Test at Hobart - 14-19 Jan 2022

[Prince EWS]

Do you do this on purpose?

No, he just has a very low IQ. Be nice.

 

[Spark]

Do you do this on purpose?

nah it was on the c7 telecast so i cbf changing threads

 

[Fuller Pilch]

Green
228 runs @ 32.57
13 wickets @ 15.76 (at the moment)

But I'd say Head or possibly still Starc if he rips out 3 or 4 more

Actually I picked Starc in the predictions thread so if Australia wins I want him taking wickets

 

[Spark]

No, he just has a very low IQ. Be nice.

i once got offered an iq test by the church of scientology of all people

 

[Prince EWS]

i once got offered an iq test by the church of scientology of all people

Haha same! I wonder what it is with them and IQ tests.

 

[stephen]

Don't they literally think psychiatrists are all demons or something? Strange that they use their methods.

 

[Gnske]

Imagine if you needed an IQ test just to post on CW

 

[Gob]

i once got offered an iq test by the church of scientology of all people

Tom Cruise - help me help you

 

[Burgey]

Going to look like an emaciated titpig in no time.

A worthy ambition tbh

 

[flibbertyjibber]

Haha same! I wonder what it is with them and IQ tests.

Testing you for gullibility?

 

[Spikey]

ben what are you doing

 

[trundler]

Absolutely CHOKED there

 

[morgieb]

Finally a Starc chance doesn't go down.

 

[Burgey]

That’s a massive wicket

 

[Gnske]

WTF was that. He hit that guy in the jaw harder than he tried to hit that ball

 

[GIMH]

Well ****

 

[Gob]

WTF was that. He hit that guy in the jaw harder than he tried to hit that ball

Man has priorities

 

[Daemon]

Haha same! I wonder what it is with them and IQ tests.

The tests are not really IQ tests, they're personality tests designed to point out flaws in your character for you to try and rectify by reading their books, watching their DVDs, signing up for courses and/or attending their services.

 

[Gnske]

What a shame this tour has given us an unsolved MISSING persons case with Stokes.

 

[GIMH]

lol m8 Stokes was plumb lbw when England were 9-down. Not to mention he would have been out a dozen other times that knock if not for having the luckiest day anyone has ever had on a cricket field

In the DRS era it’s plumb but it’s an lbw not given many times over the years. In the DRS era you’re much less ‘lucky’ to survive such an incident as the game situation is the game situation and the fact was Oz had zero reviews left having lost their heads entirely because of Ben Stokes.

Only on CW do ***** try and boil an innings that involved a huuuuge match winning partnership with a number ****ing eleven down to luck. As if there are a plethora of other batsmen who could have gone and played that innings had they had the same luck. Ignores all of the physical and mental factors that make top level sport elite. M8