I pretty much messed up day before yesterday with my password.Couldn’t have my original name.
+ 1Lara Warne Gilchrist
Is there a reason it isn't also extended to Sobers?This still gets me every time. That you can be so far in front no one bothers to have a vote. It's incredible.
Hobbs too.Is there a reason it isn't also extended to Sobers?
Additionally, and I'll let the votes bear this out. Believe that Marshall and Gilchrist deserves similar courtesies in the future. Gilly is similarly far ahead of the competition as a wicket keeper batsman and it's accepted by almost everyone on this site that Marshall is either the best, or at worst the 2nd best pacer ever. Evidenced by his unanimous selection.
Just by two cents, but in addition to Bradman, those three are also close to if not automatic selections as well. Some may not want to grant them that, but they are in that stratosphere.
Was thinking that as well, but not sure if he still qualifies as an automatic selection.Hobbs too.
We don't know for sure what he bowled, which was likely spin. He averaged 21 vs Australia which wasn't that great for the era, his overall average was only that low because he averaged 8 vs a poor S. A team.Knott ,S.F Barnes getting underrated imo.0 vote for both excluding mine.Would be interesting to see whether either of the 2 make 2nd xi.
I think because there are some idiots who believe Imran was a better all rounder than him.Is there a reason it isn't also extended to Sobers?
Not for the no. 6 position though.I think because there are some idiots who believe Imran was a better all rounder than him.
Yeah it'd be almost like having Bradman ahead of Marshall to bat 9 and open the bowling.Not for the no. 6 position though.
Not even Smali or PEWS would have Imran ahead of Sobers at 6.
Not sure why bowling allrounders are compared to batting allrounders in the first place. Completely different roles. Sobers is the best batting allrounder while Imran is the best bowling allrounder. Sobers should be compared to guys like Kallis, while Imran should be compared to guys like Hadlee and Miller.I think because there are some idiots who believe Imran was a better all rounder than him.
Agree, given that you have 3 fast bowling spots Marshall should be a lock. Gilchrist probably should too, however there's a potential situation where someone might want to pick a "pure keeper" specialist for some reason. Personally I don't think there's any keeper even close to good enough to justify selection ahead of Gilchrist (who is already a very good keeper) based on that alone, but I could see the situation arising.Is there a reason it isn't also extended to Sobers?
Additionally, and I'll let the votes bear this out. Believe that Marshall and Gilchrist deserves similar courtesies in the future. Gilly is similarly far ahead of the competition as a wicket keeper batsman and it's accepted by almost everyone on this site that Marshall is either the best, or at worst the 2nd best pacer ever. Evidenced by his unanimous selection.
Just by two cents, but in addition to Bradman, those three are also close to if not automatic selections as well. Some may not want to grant them that, but they are in that stratosphere.