• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Test at Melbourne - December 26 - 30

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Highest England averages for the last 5 years (minimum 200 runs)

Root 48, Cook 38, Stokes 38, Buttler 33, Foakes 32, Burns 31, Vince 31, Malan 30, Pope 30, Denly 30, Sibley 29, Crawley 28, Stoneman 28, Bairstow 28, Lawrence 27

Then the rest are allrounders and bowlers (plus Keaton Jennings)

The selectors have tried different options
 

ImpatientLime

International Regular
it is funny watching absolute bores like 'the cricket badger' blame the less than year old hundred for England's current predicament and suggest changes to the structure to be closer to that of the 90s. the 90s when England were such a force to be reckoned with in test match cricket.

England's batting issues pre date the 2015 switch to focus on white ball cricket so nah I'm not sure I agree that it's the root cause of their issues.

prank pitches and prank balls a bigger issue.
 

vicleggie

State Vice-Captain
The good folks on 5 Live are repeatedly describing England's performance today as 'disappointing'. One can only presume that they have somehow missed the last two tests, , indeed, the last two Ashes series in Australia. 50 ao would have been disappointing. 185 is surely what any sane person would have predicted from this shower. Probably above par in conditions where the opposing captain saw fit to insert them.
Why do England play so bad in Australia?

They play better literally everywhere else
 

Spark

Global Moderator
This feels like England of the mid 90s
It's nuts because there's clearly oodles of cricketing talent in the English system, just in terms of raw hand-eye coordination with the bat, or they wouldn't be producing so many quality LO batsmen, and there's certainly no shortage of resources. Just a totally bankrupt system in terms of producing Test batsmen
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It's nuts because there's clearly oodles of cricketing talent in the English system, just in terms of raw hand-eye coordination with the bat, or they wouldn't be producing so many quality LO batsmen, and there's certainly no shortage of resources. Just a totally bankrupt system in terms of producing Test batsmen
Tell you what’s a worry

There’s been a few comments about the training methods of the English batsmen today & it’s some of the same **** they’re doing here

Social Jr has been a member of a few elite junior squads and I have seen that one legged thing before

Made no sense then

Makes no sense now

Look at the techniques of Harris, Burns & Hameed

Bobby Simpson would take one look at those guys & chuck them into the dustbin
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Tell you what’s a worry

There’s been a few comments about the training methods of the English batsmen today & it’s some of the same **** they’re doing here

Social Jr has been a member of a few elite junior squads and I have seen that one legged thing before

Made no sense then

Makes no sense now

Look at the techniques of Harris, Burns & Hameed

Bobby Simpson would take one look at those guys & chuck them into the dustbin
I mean, at some level those blokes just aren't that talented. Honest domestic journeymen who probably don't quite have the intangibles for Tests. It's those who probably do have those raw intangibles in terms of batting talent - Buttler, Bairstow etc - whose counterparts in other countries have eventually "made it" in Tests that are the confusion to me. No Test side ought to be building their batting orders around the likes of Harris or Burns.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well that was a good day of test cricket. At least from a partisan perspective. About the only thing which would have made it better is if Boland didn't get a wicket and Harris had have been dismissed.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
T20 is a rapidly evolving form of the game

Latest development is less movement at the crease

Hello!!!!!

That’s always been the way

Warne is right

<quick shower>

The standard of many things has improved massively in cricket but, in general, batting techniques have gone backwards
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Tell you what’s a worry

There’s been a few comments about the training methods of the English batsmen today & it’s some of the same **** they’re doing here

Social Jr has been a member of a few elite junior squads and I have seen that one legged thing before

Made no sense then

Makes no sense now

Look at the techniques of Harris, Burns & Hameed

Bobby Simpson would take one look at those guys & chuck them into the dustbin
If anything, batting one legged is going to make you a worse batsman because it will train your brain to move your bat to the ball instead of moving your body into the correct position. Footwork is 90% of good test batsmanship.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Well that was a good day of test cricket. At least from a partisan perspective. About the only thing which would have made it better is if Boland didn't get a wicket and Harris had have been dismissed.
Am I the only one who finds this sorts of state-based partisanship incredibly tedious? It's driven half this country completely mad in more serious matters and been utterly, utterly miserable to have to wade through over the last two years.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Am I the only one who finds this sorts of state-based partisanship incredibly tedious? It's driven half this country completely mad in more serious matters and been utterly, utterly miserable to have to wade through over the last two years.
It's not state based anything. I really think it's wrong to drop a bloke after one test who did nothing wrong for a guy who isn't actually better than him. They should have stuck with Neser instead of going for the 32yo debutante who offers nothing greater.

Edit: I'm not saying Neser is particularly good either, but he's put in the domestic yards, has been with the test squad a lot. Honestly I'm a big Bird fan and think it's a real shame he's injured. It's not anti- Victorian bias, it's anti- selector bias.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
It's not state based anything. I really think it's wrong to drop a bloke after one test who did nothing wrong for a guy who isn't actually better than him. They should have stuck with Neser instead of going for the 32yo debutante who offers nothing greater.
I mean, didn't Cummins say yesterday that neither Neser nor Jhye were fully fit...?
 

Top