honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I mean he already has and has been much better.Then why cant he do it away?
I mean he already has and has been much better.Then why cant he do it away?
When has he won matches away the way he has done at home?I mean he already has and has been much better.
What?I would say England’s all time xi would have the highest chance of beating ind in ind.
Gavasker
Sehwag
Dravid
Sachin
Kohli(c)
Dhoni(wk)
Dev
Jadeja
Ashwin
Shami/Kumble/Chandra/Gupte
Bumrah
No bowler in history has won matches the way he has done at home.When has he won matches away the way he has done at home?
That's interesting - is that by match/series winning % or some other metric? I'm not doubting you, I'd just never seen that stated as a fact before.The fact of the matter is that no team has ever been as successful at home as Kohli's Indian team. And that is a historically relevant fact that drives ATG status. The great West Indians and Australians were never this dominant. And you can't just blame this on spinning pitches.
I said he was a bigger match winner at home than almost all ATGs.When has he won matches away the way he has done at home?
Match and series in modern era. So basically 70s and later.That's interesting - is that by match/series winning % or some other metric? I'm not doubting you, I'd just never seen that stated as a fact before.
Can find a period of very similar domination for Australia, but it was slightly shorter than India (although had more matches).That's interesting - is that by match/series winning % or some other metric? I'm not doubting you, I'd just never seen that stated as a fact before.
Thanks - that's an incredible win rate.Can find a period of very similar domination for Australia, but it was slightly shorter than India (although had more matches).
From the start of 2013 to now - India have played 40 matches at home, winning 32 and losing 2.
Between 5 Nov 1999 till the end of 2007 - Australia played 52 matches at home, winning 43 and losing 2.
You act as if Ashwin takes wickets @15 with a strikerate in the 30s in India. His figures are impressive but not earthshattering. Just to compare, Philander's figures at home (average of 19 with 43 strikerate) are actually better than Ashwin, and he is no ATG.aq
No bowler in history has won matches the way he has done at home.
The fact of the matter is that no team has ever been as successful at home as Kohli's Indian team. And that is a historically relevant fact that drives ATG status. The great West Indians and Australians were never this dominant. And you can't just blame this on spinning pitches.
Yeah and you have worms in your brain bcAshwins overseas stats include same SC as well overseas means out of ind for ash and outside of aus for Gary,stats of Lyon in ind is a average of 30.58 ,whereas his overall overseas stats is similar too it so it isn’t bowling in ind which make his overseas stats better,Lyon and ashwin have been pretty much equals outside their home.So,even excluding ind for Lyon (which doesn’t make any difference in his overseas stats ) their overseas stats are almost similar.
They both have been almost equals overseas ,as I was replying to the person who said no one is anywhere near ash and no one has anywhere near record.
And I amnot saying Lyon is better or anything I am just saying Lyon has been almost ashwins equal.
It was not an argument for anything you moron. It's just how pitches are these days as I have actually spoken to people who know **** about aus cricket pitches in Australia.If Ashwin wants to be called an ATG then his comparison is not with contemporary spinners but with the best who ever played the game. And dont give this declining pitch argument for why he has failed to win matches in SENA, something even lesser spinners like Yasir Shah, Lyon and Herath have managed to do.
Ashwin has had multiple opportunities where the match has been set up in his favor and he didnt seal the deal, such as Wanderers 2013, Centurion 2018 or Southhampton 2018.
So because of pitches these days he is unable to win a match in SENA?It was not an argument for anything you moron. It's just how pitches are these days as I have actually spoken to people who know **** about aus cricket pitches in Australia.
As for your other ****, it is not what I was talking about so it's not worth my time
Actually every home spinner except jaddu and ash were average as ****. These two are doing things that no one has in test history as spinners.His figures are impressive but not earthshattering.
What do you mean by a winning performance in SENA? You expect him to take 6 or 7 or 8 wickets in an innings?So because of pitches these days he is unable to win a match in SENA?