Players who would suck now

[Gnske]

Donald Bradman. I swear, I saw videos of his "Batting". We think of him as the landmark of batting when really what did he have to face? Idiots. Larwood with long hops? Yes please sir, averaging 50? That would be his norm now.

Someone like Bradman would average 46.51 today.

 

[TheJediBrah]

Travis Head

 

[GIMH]

Allan Border. Wouldn’t get away with bullying umpires in the DRS age

 

[Coronis]

W.G Grace. Couldn’t stay in for the crowds when he got out anymore.

 

[honestbharani]

Someone like Bradman would average 46.51 today.

Its fine and all but could you really not find a better number when the title says "suck"?

 

[Gnske]

If you don't average at least 52 you aren't worth remembering.

 

[_Ed_]

If you don't average at least 52 you aren't worth remembering.

Adam Voges likes this.

 

[Gnske]

@Hurricane2 stand for _Ed_

 

[Athlai]

Bradman would average around 55 today

 

[Athlai]

Bradman would average around 55 today

He'd still average 100 in Au and eng, but like 20 in India

 

[Gnske]

He'd still average 100 in Au and eng, but like 20 in India

E-EX ACTLY. White men can't play spin. I guarantee you spinners these days, even someone like Lamicchane would rule over Bradman.

He would have been fisted by Saeed Ajmal at his prime and whined about him being a cheater.

 

[Gob]

Bradman

 

[Burgey]

Kohli by the looks of things

 

[Gob]

Wait till JBMAC sees this thread. Gnske has some questions to answer

 

[TheJediBrah]

Wasim Akram + Imran Khan

With neutral umpires & it being harder to get away with ball tampering they would be averaging 35+ with the ball

 

[h_hurricane]

Glenn Mcgrath

All those lbws on inside edges will be reversed by DRS.

 

[Nikhil99.94]

Bradman,would suck now would be brought back to earth and would have averaged just 80 now.By using same method like the don ,gavasker would suck too and average 32 now too.

 

[h_hurricane]

Bradman,would suck now would be brought back to earth and would have averaged just 80 now.By using same method like the don ,gavasker would suck too and average 32 now too.

And DK Lillee to average "negative six" by this method.

 

[harsh.ag]

If you don't average at least 52 you aren't worth remembering.

Mohammad Sami likes this

 

[JBMAC]

Donald Bradman. I swear, I saw videos of his "Batting". We think of him as the landmark of batting when really what did he have to face? Idiots. Larwood with long hops? Yes please sir, averaging 50? That would be his norm now.

Someone like Bradman would average 46.51 today.

Absolute Codswallop!!!!. How did you arrive at this figure? You may have seen "videos of his batting" BUT i saw the man bat on numerous occasions in person and i assure you , you are so far off the mark to be laughable. I would like to know the source of your information on what "your figure" would be his average. Bradman was / is in a class of his own and you, young fella obviously know very little about the game of Cricket . (Just for your own info i am in a position to judge your pathetic attempt at starting a contemptous thread having played Grade, State and Australian rep Cricket giving up the gamewhen i was 44 and still playing "A" grade)