He scored 85 in a final in his last innings?It's a shame Kane isn't in form or that we don't have Conway.
He scored 85 in a final in his last innings?It's a shame Kane isn't in form or that we don't have Conway.
We gambhirinh nowHe scored 85 in a final in his last innings?
I honestly don't reckon it is. Or not without losing 2-3-4 wickets, which then negates your ability to score the runs. Anyone who can score at 4s or above on this deck with India able to set whatever fields they want, would be beyond a genius110-130 in the final session is doable
Only if we figure out how to score runs off Axar.110-130 in the final session is doable
I'm in.We gambhirinh now
....Ishant off again for finger treatment.
Very high risk forcing the pace against the spinners110-130 in the final session is doable
You have to dangle the carrot by risking defeat in order to winThey only need 3 rpo, that's not a scenario when the fielding team can really go negative and expect it to work. If it was 4+rpo sure. India made a mistake yesterday, they either should've kept batting or started smashing a few overs earlier and got 30-40 more. Felt a very odd declaration.
A very modern declaration though. Trying to declare as a surprise to the opposition than actually trying to maximize the game situation and advantage. I hope we do not become an analysts' team like England have.They only need 3 rpo, that's not a scenario when the fielding team can really go negative and expect it to work. If it was 4+rpo sure. India made a mistake yesterday, they either should've kept batting or started smashing a few overs earlier and got 30-40 more. Felt a very odd declaration.
Although the 3.75 they currently need is closer to 4 than 3, and is higher than either of the teams have scored in any innings so far.They only need 3 rpo, that's not a scenario when the fielding team can really go negative and expect it to work. If it was 4+rpo sure.