You specifically said that all bowlers will be threatening on this track.1. I did not say Southee and KJ were not good bowlers. I actually said they bowled well to get those wickets.
2. Immaterial
3. So are Ishant and Umesh. Does not mean everyone will be threatening on this track.
4. Maybe. But these points are relative. The likeliest bowlers to get you wickets should be bowling more and in tandem. That was the point.
Yeah, the problem for NZ will be that this is a pitch where all bowlers seem dangerous. Fast bowlers with the swing and uneven bounce. Spinners with turn and uneven bounce. There is also the fact that pitch itself seems a bit two paced off certain lengths which means strokeplay can be a nightmare, esp. for non SC batsmen. NZ always fight hard and they expect them to do the same here too, but I wont be surprised if they are bundled out very quickly and cheaply here.
lol... Uneven bounce, uneven pace and loads of swing and reverse swing. This is as good as it gets for seamers in India mate, perhaps as good as it gets anywhere in SC.
Maybe not Ishant... As he is past it. But Umesh has amazing numbers in India.. And has outbowled likes of Rabada Nortje Anderson Broad here.You specifically said that all bowlers will be threatening on this track.
Respectfully, Ishant and Umesh are not the bowlers that Southee and KJ are.
Had forgotten his one-off tour of India in 2015 until reminded by that old scorecard. Was genuinely excellent, so if there's one place his advice in the NZ camp may be useful, it's India.always amazes me to see Luke Ronchi in the coaching setup (and when he was in the team).
Yeah, when he bowled well he got wickets on pitches that are difficult for pace bowlers...that's kinda the pointMaybe not Ishant... As he is past it. But Umesh has amazing numbers in India.. And has outbowled likes of Rabada Nortje Anderson Broad here.
He's showing why other players like Latham and Taylor have taken the risk of coming down the wicket - if you do nothing proactive then you go nowhere and will end up worked over by the spinner eventually.Blundell 4 off 36 trying to block the ball into kingdomcum
Promising but unproven.How was Rachin as a batter? Before this Test I mean?
He's proper. Opens for Wellington. Averaging high 30s only so far, though.How was Rachin as a batter? Before this Test I mean?
100 percent agree straw manHe's showing why other players like Latham and Taylor have taken the risk of coming down the wicket - if you do nothing proactive then you go nowhere and will end up worked over by the spinner eventually.
1st class av of 38. Classy but unproven.How was Rachin as a batter? Before this Test I mean?