See my 2nd post.Surprised Greg Chappell hasnt been mentioned.
How tf would someone have measured that with any accuracyI just saw a post in insta and Steve smith averages 98 against 140+ speed
It’s posted in Instagram by fox cricket in Jan 22,2020.as per it smith averages 98 and the 2nd highest is virat and that’s 56 then it’s in high 40s.How tf would someone have measured that with any accuracy
It might very well be true but I'm skeptical as to where the data came from
Was that even the 10th fastest spell Shoaib bowled? The bounce makes it look very fast. Ponting was very good, there is no question about iy, but I have seen many faster spells from Shoaib that looked far less spectacular.Remember when Pakistan fans went ape **** over that lightning fast spell Shoaib bowled to Ponting and Langer at the WACA and how it was a such a great example of sheer, terrifying pace on a really fast deck, but forgot to mention Ponting made 190?
It wasn't the Perth of 40 years ago, where pure pace might bother even an ATG player of pace like Ponting. And it isnt a ground that the ball swings much at, nor is Akhtar a seam bowler, who would have been more effective.If there’s a deck he could roll up and carry around to bowl on it’d be perth. Same for anyone who bowled real heat. That was a quality knock against proper pace by Ponting, who hadn’t scored a run in the series up til then. Even jagged a pair in Hobart.
i mean, I know it’s not Kandy or Colombo, but it does have a rep of helping fast bowlers
I guess Imran is bit like Warne here while rating cricketers. Warne too goes strongly by instinct and rates Merv Hughes very highly, even above Allan Donald. He prioritizes match winners over stats it seems.That isn't really true IMO. The problem with Imran is that he is biased towards "fearless" players and "match winners" hence his low rating for Zaheer Abbas and until 1988 WI tour, even Miandad, and his love for players like Viv Richards and Ian Chappell.
Also if he thinks somebody has potential, he will back them in the face of all opposition and common sense e.g. the Elahi guy in his playing days, Abdul Qadir (the greatest legspinner to every play until that time if Imran was to be taken at face value), and Malcolm Sami, to name just a few.
Incidentally he also backs the Punjab Chief Minister (a guy called Buzdar) who really sucks and calls him another Wasim Akram.
The point is, that's the way he has always functioned, and if he doesn't rate anybody in the beginning, he rarely changes his mind. His instincts have served him well in cricket, until they haven't and he's carried this problem all through his life.
Yep, he loved "fearless" cricketers and admired Gavaskar playing in his floppy hat and Viv staring down fast bowlers. These were the two top batsman of his time according to him.I guess Imran is bit like Warne here while rating cricketers. Warne too goes strongly by instinct and rates Merv Hughes very highly, even above Allan Donald. He prioritizes match winners over stats it seems.