The mod team needs to be reviewed

[Athlai]

I'd enjoy the modding experience if I could arbitrarily block people from certain threads like on cricsim

 

[Son Of Coco]

Also, is there a list of ex-mods?

Can we be provided with one, along with a reason why they were fired. Cheers

It'll be more fun if they just provide a list of names, and we come up with reasons why they were fired.

 

[Shri]

i promise swift if inaccurate justice

even if the wrong person gets banned, that is a sacrifice i am willing to make

 

[Anil]

that's the spirit, need more mods like you man...

 

[GIMH]

Oooh check out the libertarian advocating hierarchies of control within a community.

Yes what with this being a mandatory, state ran operation. You ****ing moron

 

[Smudge]

As a well-respected senior member of CW, I am willing to oversee this review. If it pleases the forum, I will spend the next week scoping the terms of reference.

I trust James will provide me with full contact details for all moderators and members I deem it appropriate to approach in order to conduct this important review. I expect this evidence-gathering process will take six weeks then another six weeks to prepare the report. Like all bad news, I will look to bury my recommendations at the least opportune time, so expect it to be released around Christmas Eve.

Happy to take any questions and/or bribes via DM.

 

[Line and Length]

I'm sure there are a number of regular contributors who would make very good mods. In general they are those who have shown to be the voices of reason, those who avoid overly aggressive confrontation and who those who are well respected by their peers.
Should having a record (ie been banned) make members ineligible to serve as a mod? Or would that make them more aware of which posts are inappropriate and likely to cause offence?

 

[Lillian Thomson]

Anyone who wants to be a mod already is.

 

[cnerd123]

anyone who wants to be mod probably shouldn't be trusted with that responsibility tbh. already demonstrating poor judgement and a thirst for power.

 

[Burgey]

Yes what with this being a mandatory, state ran operation. You ****ing moron

hIeRaRcHy Of PoWeR

Hypocrisy writ large.

H Y P O C R I SY
Y
P
O
C
R
I
S
Y

Gimh

 

[GIMH]

One of your dumbest ever posts, no mean feat

 

[Himannv]

Once I become Mod, you'll all be forced into participating in drafts. No exceptions.

 

[GIMH]

I have a line manager in work, and I am also a line manager of others

Burgey thoughts: oooh look at this libertarian who doesn't think you should just do whatever you want in the workplace and answer to no-one!!!!

 

[Burgey]

Lol as if you're in charge of anyone or anything. Please, you might be able to fool these buffoons, but I've actually met you.

 

[Son Of Coco]

I'm sure there are a number of regular contributors who would make very good mods. In general they are those who have shown to be the voices of reason, those who avoid overly aggressive confrontation and who those who are well respected by their peers.

Thanks for the vote of confidence LaL!

 

[Neil Pickup]

Hopefully I get banned by Neil Pickup.

Good evening. I don’t believe we’ve met…?

 

[Gob]

Why don't we hold an election once in six months to elect the mods? People can do their campaigns prior to the election aswell

 

[Gnske]

Would be more democratic. Basically run by dictators who rarely appear, and the cronies that do are just the Propaganda Ministers that are no different to Old Prospector Joe Goebbels.

 

[Shri]

Why don't we hold an election once in six months to elect the mods? People can do their campaigns prior to the election aswell

View attachment 29466

yearly botm means yearly

 

[cnerd123]

maybe the winner of BOTM should get to appoint the Mod team