• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Dhoni v Gilchrist

Dhoni v Gilchrist

  • Dhoni

  • Gilchrist


Results are only viewable after voting.

Jack1

International Debutant
Who is really more valuable to a team overall? If you had to pick one to build a team around (first team pick in a multi national team) for all three formats which one is it? I am considering batting, keeping and leadership qualities, running between wickets etc.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
nah no way. Prime Gilchrist would have been a T20 god and Dhoni wasn't great in the format
Doubt Gilchrist would have better stats than Jason Roy in t20i given a long run of games. If you prefer Jason Roy's stats to Dhoni's in t20i for a team's benefit that's your call
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Gilchrist easy.

Dhoni didn't do much in T20Is. 2 50s in 80+ innings and not a particularly high SR either. Gilchrist barely played the format, so I'm inclined to ignore this.

The distance Gilchrist is ahead of Dhoni in Tests is a lot higher than the opposite in ODIs imo.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
The OP said build a team around. Which means the captaincy becomes vital. Without Dhoni, I do not see India surviving losing the golden generation within a year or each other basically. His captaincy means Dhoni easily over Gilchrist.

And FWIW, I do think the fact that MSD is a 40+ averaging batsman in SC and SC like conditions means the difference in their test output is also only as much as their difference in ODI output.
 

sunilz

International Regular
Gilchrist was the captain who won Australia test series in India. Australia lost the only test in which Ponting was captain. Gilchrist also captained his team to IPL trophy in 2009. Very under rated cricketer.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
The OP said build a team around. Which means the captaincy becomes vital. Without Dhoni, I do not see India surviving losing the golden generation within a year or each other basically. His captaincy means Dhoni easily over Gilchrist.

And FWIW, I do think the fact that MSD is a 40+ averaging batsman in SC and SC like conditions means the difference in their test output is also only as much as their difference in ODI output.
And if not captain I would rather my captain be able to tactically confer with Dhoni when he wants than Gilchrist . Dhoni is the better keeper too in my view. You will get extra team runs from his running too compared to Gilchrist at times which can be forgotten thinking about a player.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Dhoni is the better keeper too in my view.
??

On what basis? Dhoni was an excellent keeper to spin but Gilchrist was no slouch (and, obviously, critical to multiple subcontinent tour victories) and Dhoni was horrible in challenging seaming conditions
 

Jack1

International Debutant
??

On what basis? Dhoni was an excellent keeper to spin but Gilchrist was no slouch (and, obviously, critical to multiple subcontinent tour victories) and Dhoni was horrible in challenging seaming conditions
On the basis of my opinion overall for a three format team. Gilchrist is better vs seam and Dhoni vs spin.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Gilchrist

The captaincy package is possibly the only thing that swings this in Dhoni’s favour but he was also a meh test captain so **** that ****
 
  • Like
Reactions: vcs

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Gilchrist was the captain who won Australia test series in India. Australia lost the only test in which Ponting was captain. Gilchrist also captained his team to IPL trophy in 2009. Very under rated cricketer.
3 tests are enough to judge a captain now? :) And that IPL trophy was good but MSD has been leading them to wins and playoffs every season inspite of a very limited team each year. MSD is in a different stratosphere as a captain. And Gilly struggled a bit less than MSD when the ball swung as a keeper but at the end of the day, they dropped around the same percentage of chances, so it really does not mean much.

MSD = Gilly as a bat across formats.

MSD >> Gilly as a captain across formats.

Gilly ~= MSD as a keeper across formats.
 

sunilz

International Regular
3 tests are enough to judge a captain now? :) And that IPL trophy was good but MSD has been leading them to wins and playoffs every season inspite of a very limited team each year. MSD is in a different stratosphere as a captain. And Gilly struggled a bit less than MSD when the ball swung as a keeper but at the end of the day, they dropped around the same percentage of chances, so it really does not mean much.

MSD = Gilly as a bat across formats.

MSD >> Gilly as a captain across formats.

Gilly ~= MSD as a keeper across formats.
No way MSD =Gilly as a bat considering the difference in their test batting.
 

sunilz

International Regular
Yes way when you give up bias and see actual performances across 3 formats.




Yeah, I know you hate facts and reality.
Dhoni was inferior to Gilly in Test. Was garbage T20 I bat. I don't give much importance to T20 leagues.

This is why I also consider Kohli > Devilliers &Gayle in T20 batting because of huge difference in their batting average in T20 I .
 

Top