AndersonFast bowlers who do well on flat pitches and flop in good bowling conditions?
They're a rare breed.
He's talking about the opposite of AndersonAnderson
I've long had a feeling that players can have a 'home advantage' in even seemingly unfavourable conditions. Like how non-Asian spinners do worse in Asia, or how Kapil was successful on the bare West Indian pitches that rather resembled his home pitches yet was bad in seemingly favourable England. The whole 'oh fast bowler x was so disadvantaged by home pitches in Asia' - well maybe if they'd learned their cricket on the overseas pitches, but otherwise not necessarily (especially funny when players have a worse away record).No . You have described most of the Asian fast bowlers like Srinath, Vaas etc
Yeah it's like "Let's bring in a guy who averages mid 20's with the bat because cummins is tired, but let's also bring in a workhorse bowler over a strike bowler, and ohh, while where at it let's ****ing bat second with a lineup that's failed all series bar 2 players while where an extra batsmen down." Who would have thought that would happen, huh?Just to clarify my previous comment, I would probably not have picked Starc at the Oval, Patt0 was my preference. But certainly not Siddle, considering Mitch Marsh was coming into the team (he bowled bloody well that test fwiw) it looked pretty clear that someone with more firepower would be a better bet
Just a selection entirely devoid of any logic or reason
No disagreement whatsoever on this one. It just didn't seem like there was any coherent line of thought behind any of the decision makingYeah it's like "Let's bring in a guy who averages mid 20's with the bat because cummins is tired, but let's also bring in a workhorse bowler over a strike bowler, and ohh, while where at it let's ****ing bat second with a lineup that's failed all series bar 2 players while where an extra batsmen down." Who would have thought that would happen, huh?
I feel like the decision to bowl first in that test is the kind of thing I'll still grumble about in a couple of decades' time. After what had happened there the previous time it was just incredible.No disagreement whatsoever on this one. It just didn't seem like there was any coherent line of thought behind any of the decision making
The grills are more spaced out and cover more in the new types. Also farther in front of ur face I think.Got this idea from the butcher/bairstoe thread
View attachment 29404
Anyone know why this particular brand of helmet went out of use? This was very common around 06 and looked like the safest up to that point
I still have mine from about 2012. They're still around I think?A better question is: what happened to Albion helmets in general? They were the brand when I started playing in 2010 (might even still have the Greg Chappell Cricket Centre catalogue with them) but not too many years later they've completely disappeared.