h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
This is the first time India have won 2 overseas tests in a series after conceding lead in first innings on both occasions. What a ****ing beautiful show.
You may be right there. It felt a different game for our openers to face a few overs after Thakur's assault, compared to starting out if we'd dismissed them for 130 odd. The other turning point was when our first innings fizzled out far too quickly, as if we'd already won the match. We actually did something similar in the previous test, but there our lead was so big that their mini-revival in the 3rd innings didn't matter. The other factor was our comedy catching of course.Good performance from India. The match started to change at 120 for 7 on day one. When it has to be said some England fans were already celebrating a series win and some Indian fans were wanting their team beaten over the heads with something wet.
Yeah that WTC loss hurts. Enough ambushes already, all teams should insist on three Tests against NZ at the minimum.Winning in Australia and England in the same year feels pretty huge. If it was not for New Zealand it would be complete.
Not sure what went wrong really, England looked comfortable last night and with such elite test batsman like Bairstow and Ali to come it looked an easy England win.well done India
Have been crying our for this for agesYeah that WTC loss hurts. Enough ambushes already, all teams should insist on three Tests against NZ at the minimum.
I got the other posts but this is not in good taste dude. We have received enough losses as India fans to know why rubbing it in is so cheap.Not sure what went wrong really, England looked comfortable last night and with such elite test batsman like Bairstow and Ali to come it looked an easy England win.
England's batting felt like the huge missed opportunity, so many wickets were gifted, such as Moeen, Hameed, Robinson and, as ridiculous as it sounds, Woakes (who I think could have got loads more).You may be right there. It felt a different game for our openers to face a few overs after Thakur's assault, compared to starting out if we'd dismissed them for 130 odd. The other turning point was when our first innings fizzled out far too quickly, as if we'd already won the match. We actually did something similar in the previous test, but there our lead was so big that their mini-revival in the 3rd innings didn't matter. The other factor was our comedy catching of course.
ATG 2-ferLooks like I missed a special spell. Hussain, Warne, Root, Silverwood, Kohli, Atherton have all been praising Bumrah’s spell to high heavens.
i think we've figured out the topic for your next CC threadATG 2-fer
More than a few folks on CW were saying that Anderson should be rested and Wood play instead of him in this one. If only Silverwood had listened to them. Talking of whom, cricket's version of Steve McLaren?Fair play India. Better team won. Dare I say the extra Indian pace was maybe the decisive factor? The slightly monochromatic nature of our attack is really shown up when the ball refuses to go off the straight.
Just listened to Silverwood's interview. He's a deeply unimpressive speaker. The lack of insight was almost zen like.
The French Peter Moores, for my quid.More than a few folks on CW were saying that Anderson should be rested and Wood play instead of him in this one. If only Silverwood had listened to them. Talking of whom, cricket's version of Steve McLaren?
Given who our alternatives are samey-ness is the lesser of two evils imoFair play India. Better team won. Dare I say the extra Indian pace was maybe the decisive factor? The slightly monochromatic nature of our attack is really shown up when the ball refuses to go off the straight.