Hyuck hyuckOK Sportwash
Not necessarily, as it's an incredibly serious offence, but as I understand things it's uncommon for someone to be remanded in custody after being charged having never actually been arrested/been kept in custody up to the point of being charged.Quite unusual to be remanded for that sort of offence isn't it @sledger ?
Not necessarily, as it's an incredibly serious offence, but as I understand things it's uncommon for someone to be remanded in custody after being charged having never actually been arrested/been kept in custody up to the point of being charged.
Ah yeah, in that case that makes a lot more sense. No idea how it kept out of the news though.View attachment 29020
Doesn't that contradict this? Says he was arrested in November. How has this not made news before this?
If he wasn't charged would they have even necessarily known?How in the **** were the club letting this **** play. **** me. Disgusting. Last alleged incident was last Monday. **** off.
Would imagine the reason why it's not made the papers till now is because city's PR people got tipped off (perhaps by the player himself) and they managed to keep it out if the press somehow tbhIf he wasn't charged would they have even necessarily known?
Makes sense. United need him more.Sky are saying now that Ronaldo is heading back to Old Trafford and City don't want him.
Club should be dragged across the coals if this is true tbh.Would imagine the reason why it's not made the papers till now is because city's PR people got tipped off (perhaps by the player himself) and they managed to keep it out if the press somehow tbh
True.Would imagine the reason why it's not made the papers till now is because city's PR people got tipped off (perhaps by the player himself) and they managed to keep it out if the press somehow tbh
Done deal?He's coming home!
Done.Done deal?
Deal.Done.