Spark
Global Moderator
Does "the chasing side might score 200 runs in a session with six wickets in hand" really require active refutation?can you logically refute anything i just said?
edit: never mind...
Does "the chasing side might score 200 runs in a session with six wickets in hand" really require active refutation?can you logically refute anything i just said?
edit: never mind...
Do aw nos count as aws or do they get wiped from the record?still counts imo
sure it does, stranger things have happened (in fact just earlier today with the shami-bumrah partnership)...anyway my argument was based on root shepherding them home with support from the others...Does "the chasing side might score 200 runs in a session with six wickets in hand" really require active refutation?
Scoring at ~a run a ball for a full session in fading light in a Test match when your top order has collapsed is way way way way way stranger than a fighting tail-end partnership.sure it does, stranger things have happened (in fact just earlier today with the shami-bumrah partnership)...anyway my argument was based on root shepherding them home with support from the others...
You stupid mother****er KohliKohli talking **** and wearing a stupid grin when he hasn't earned the right to is annoying me irrationally
not if root was still there...anyway it is a moot point now...Scoring at ~a run a ball for a full session in fading light in a Test match when your top order has collapsed is way way way way way stranger than a fighting tail-end partnership.
I can believe he dropped that oneBOOM BOOM
Can't believe Panauti held that catch. Huge moment. The pitch invader who was trying to run at him must have scared him into focusing.
It might be moot now, at the time it was made it was ****.not if root was still there...anyway it is a moot point now...