• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why cricket is not popular?

AndreHenry

Cricket Spectator
Good morning,
I like to play sports, the sport that I like to play the most is probably cricket. I find this to be a pretty good sport and a very good workout. However, I do not understand why this sport is not widely popular? Do you know why?
Thank you very much.
 

Jack1

International Debutant
It is overall. You need to include every country that plays. It is difficult to understand for beginners.
 

cnerd123

likes this
It's not popular because throughout the history of the game the administrators have done everything they can to exclude others from playing.

The earliest days it was just a sport for the rich elite and excluded the working classes, then after colonization it was just a sport for the white man. Indigenous populations and women were not invited to pay, and often were literally banned from the grounds.

It took ages for cricket to become inclusive of all races and genders (tho tbf one can argue they were ahead of the curve when compared to several other sports), but by that point the major cricket boards were now more interested in excluding smaller nations from playing the game at the highest level, let alone involving them in the running and administration of it.

That was changing for a brief while, and there was more emphasis put on Associate cricket tournaments and developing cricket in new regions. Nations like SL, BD became full members, the ACC was set up with Associates as the founding members, and we had tournaments like the WCL and Intercontinental Cup. But then the Big 3 takeover happened. Forget new nations, the existing non-Big 3 ones were now struggling. In 2007 we had 16 teams in a World Cup, but by 2019 we only had 10. We're the only sport that is shrinking our World Cup.

Cricket already is a difficult sport at the best of times to introduce to people unfamiliar with it. The laws are complex, you need a lot of resources to play it (compared to other sports), and we have three different formats of the same sport essentially competing for the attention of a single market. It does not help when the Administrators in charge are more interested in making a quick buck through broadcast deals and petty political bickering rather than actually trying to grow how many people engage with the sport.

Despite that all metrics show cricket to be amongst the Top 5 sports in the world. Yes there are a billion Indians that account for this, but even then it's extremely popular in a lot of nations, and it's growth in the past few decades has been solid. Stories like Afghanistan, Thailand women and Sandeep Lamichhanne are evidence of this.

Cricket is just fundamentally a great sport, we just need administrators who believe in it and are willing to get out of it's way. However this is unlikely given how the global game is currently administered.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
cricket has too many annoying demands

need a proper pitch that then has to be maintained
need a massive field
new balls are expensive af
can't play if its raining
probably can't play even if it's stopped raining because everything's wet
need way too much gear
takes the entire day
need enough fielders otherwise you'll be chasing leather all day
takes too long to teach everyone the rules
incredibly tough learning curve at the start
 

Coronis

International Coach
Example in United States
Becausethe USA has baseball instead. Cricket was always a traditionally British sport and most of the top countries that play it are former colonies. The US’s earlier discovery and independence pushed it away from cricket.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Becausethe USA has baseball instead. Cricket was always a traditionally British sport and most of the top countries that play it are former colonies. The US’s earlier discovery and independence pushed it away from cricket.
Incorrect. Cricket was doing reasonably well up until the first world war
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Becausethe USA has baseball instead. Cricket was always a traditionally British sport and most of the top countries that play it are former colonies. The US’s earlier discovery and independence pushed it away from cricket.
Yes. Baseball is ok but overly structured compared to cricket. Not much license for the players other than for the pitcher
 

Engle

State Vice-Captain
Former British PM John Major wrote a book on cricket (More than a Game) and presented the 1st copy to George Bush Sr.

He describes his attempt to explain cricket to George Bush senior: “[His] eyes swivelled when he realised that a match could last five days and yet still not produce a winner.”
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Bradman spoke of a conversation with Babe Ruth and the latter was stunned that you could let the ball go by all day and didn’t have to run if you hit it.
 

Chrish

International Debutant
I always fantasize how good world would have been if cricket were popular in Europe and South America like football? How many great players have we missed out on if cricket had the same talent pool available?
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Cricket is popular.

Depending on how such things are worked out it usually ranks the second or third most popular team sport, behind association football (always) and basketball (sometimes).
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Cricket's mathematically popularity is due to the size of India's population, but it's not widespread except in some parts of the non cricketing world where ex-pats have set up clubs.
 

Top