Let us call the winner of this match the winner of a test match in england, rather than world champs, thanks.
True, NZ would have backed themselves to do far more damage. At the same time India seeing off that first hour and not cashing in has balanced the scales somewhat.When you win the toss with this much cloud cover and conditions that favor seamers and you have picked 5 seamers, I think anything over 200 by the opposition is a L. That said, it does not mean 200 is the par score either. But I think that is the way to look at it at this point.
No that’s exactly how it works.just because the icc says, doesn't mean winner of this match is the champs.
That’s something I was not too sure of either. Guess they’re looking at (gambling on?) the fact that the weather will intervene and make spin less integral to the outcome. But yes, to justify that need to keep India to 250 or less, probably no more than 300.At work, so missed all this, but NZ choosing to bat 4th against this indian attack on a surface that suits spin is lol bad.
I agree, if India want to try and win this they should have got themselves at least five down by now.Good Morning so far but I was/am hoping for an extremely low scoring game, so we’d have a chance of a result.
I agree, if India want to try and win this they should have got themselves at least five down by now.
He's trying to bring back to fashion the ascot cap from the early 1900s.Why is Macca dressed like he’s time travelled from the industrial revolution?
There won't be any 4th innings if India get out for < 200.At work, so missed all this, but NZ choosing to bat 4th against this indian attack on a surface that suits spin is lol bad.
Greedy pigletSouthee and Boult need to be on the money after lunch.