honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Not denying that. I thought I even posted that in my post. He was immense in 2005 and was his best performance in a series IMO.Was a one man army in 2005. Ridiculous series
Not denying that. I thought I even posted that in my post. He was immense in 2005 and was his best performance in a series IMO.Was a one man army in 2005. Ridiculous series
Why though? Take the moral high ground
Anyway facts time
England top ten batsman from 90s
View attachment 27997
Bangladesh top ten batsmen from 00s
View attachment 27998
Now I'm not saying England were good they were mediocre but I'd still back them over that Bangladesh lot against spin, pace, beach cricket and any other form of batsmanship which includes hitting a ball with a bat
A high praise for the CW contingent, I am sure.Definitely not the case haha. The average cricket fan in Australia is much more stridently anti-Murali than the CW contingent.
@harsh.ag am I allowed to respond to all the falsity in this post or is that bad for forum atmosphere?Haha, yes, when I say they sucked against spin, bring up overall records.
England in the 90s averaged something like 26 in India and simply sucked against spin. Bangladesh in the 00s were hapless, but were still better at playing spin and that was shown by how the smashed Warne around in the series he played in. That is just a fact. AFAIC, 90s England were worse at playing spin than 2000s Bangladesh was. And if you can filter the stats, you will see it is true.
I don't want to make any policy. I'm not blaming you. But it would be better for everyone if you didn't take such a hard line against stupid posts. That's all. Take it for what it is.If you want to make it official policy to disallow responding to "stupid, wrong, biased" posts then that is very interesting, to say the least
also shows your own bias in blaming me rather than the people (usually the same people too) who make said posts to begin with
I have been more ****y than usual last few days. Been very quiet at work and trying to pass the time. Going on holiday next week though so should leave you ****ers alone more than usualI don't want to make any policy. I'm not blaming you. But it would be better for everyone if you didn't take such a hard line against stupid posts. That's all. Take it for what it is.
Replace warne with McGrath. Truly great sides don’t need a front line spinner at all. Sobers can bowl the boring overs in between the real bowlers getting it donehobbs
hutton
bradman
tendulkar
smith
sobers
gilchrist
imran
hadlee
marshall
warne
Warne is Boring... Get Mcgrath.Replace warne with McGrath. Truly great sides don’t need a front line spinner at all. Sobers can bowl the boring overs in between the real bowlers getting it done
Ames.Gavaskar
Hobbs
Bradman
Richards
Tendulkar
Sobers
Knott
Marshall
Lillee
Trueman
Murali
It would be impossible not to pick Gilchrist for an actual match, but Knott is still the best keeper and a decent keeper/batsman.
Queensland, family house close to the NSW border. Very nice place and short drives either way to Gold Coast, Bondi, Blue Mountains etc.Where are you going?
I don't need to bring up Tendulkar's record against spin to justify that he is better player against spin compared to Greame SmithHaha, yes, when I say they sucked against spin, bring up overall records.
Bedser bowled more overs per match than Warne. Often had the keeper standing up to the stumps I believe. Not exactly a fair comparison. Laker was a spinner so there's that. Trueman stands out of course and his strike rate is truly exceptional but then he was the GOAT pacer when he retired. That era was undeniably grim in terms of scoring rates though.Bedser, Laker, Trueman.. All were taking 4+ wpm
If WPM is that important, how come you have Wasim as the greatest ever bowler? His WPM was below 4Top 7 bowler, Top 6 pacer. You can have him higher.. I think my ranking is pretty reasonable.
Akram
Marshall
Hadlee
Murali
Steyn
Lillee
Mcgrath
Warne
I find it a disservice to paying spectators and general cricket viewers to have to go through the pain to watch some one running in to bowl 10 overs an hour ,risking a potential ban to his captain due to filthy over-rates and trundling off with some injury when the team needs him the most.Replace warne with McGrath. Truly great sides don’t need a front line spinner at all. Sobers can bowl the boring overs in between the real bowlers getting it done
Laker was a spinner, his SR 57.9Bedser bowled more overs per match than Warne. Often had the keeper standing up to the stumps I believe. Not exactly a fair comparison. Laker was a spinner so there's that. Trueman stands out of course and his strike rate is truly exceptional but then he was the GOAT pacer when he retired. That era was undeniably grim in terms of scoring rates though.
Wicket per inningsIf WPM is that important, how come you have Wasim as the greatest ever bowler? His WPM was below 4