*Official* India v England 3-ODI series at Maharashtra CA Stadium, Pune

[honestbharani]

Needs to sort out his conversion issues if he wants to remain part of the Fab 4.

If this means 4 double centuries in a row or whatever next year, I will take it.

 

[slippy888]

India need to post around 320 i think, England are fragile cricket team

 

[Ashwinashwath]

KL Rahul has started scoring briskly now.

 

[slippy888]

Rahul needs to take advantage here and get the 100 score

 

[slippy888]

Need a quick cameo from pant a 30 score off 20 balls is more important at this stage

 

[Ashwinashwath]

KL Rahul and Hardik Pandya got caught in the bollywood talk show and spoke some silly showoff flashy lifestyle stuff akin to bollywood and lost their integrity. Otherwise he was to ground his name as a cricketing great.

 

[Red_Ink_Squid]

Curran & Curran bowling to Pandya and Pandya at the death should be what both sides are aiming for, right?

 

[MW1304]

Good Lord that is so lucky.

 

[honestbharani]

So basically, if its the last ball of the match or the innings and the batsman hits the ball to a 4, I can review for LBW and have the 4 not be counted, right?

 

[Ashwinashwath]

Curran & Curran bowling to Pandya and Pandya at the death should be what both sides are aiming for, right?

That would be a comedy of errors like some midsummers nights dream

 

[anil1405]

Good Lord that is so lucky.

That is so shitty from ICC not to give a boundary for that.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

So basically, if its the last ball of the match or the innings and the batsman hits the ball to a 4, I can review for LBW and have the 4 not be counted, right?

not unless you convince the ump to give you out first, i think

 

[MW1304]

That is so ****ty from ICC not to give a boundary for that.

Can count himself lucky not to splatter the **** out of his stumps, not going to cry for him missing out on 4.

 

[honestbharani]

not unless you convince the ump to give you out first, i think

Yeah, still stupid though.

 

[MW1304]

So basically, if its the last ball of the match or the innings and the batsman hits the ball to a 4, I can review for LBW and have the 4 not be counted, right?

No, he has to be given out for it to be a dead ball.

 

[honestbharani]

Still a stupid rule IMO. You get 4 if you bowl the batsman off a no-ball and the ball goes for 4, right?

 

[MW1304]

Yeah keep bowling a nothing length on the hip, definitely going to go well.

 

[Red_Ink_Squid]

not unless you convince the ump to give you out first, i think

Yeah, I think it's dead ball because of the onfield decision that the batsman was out, not because of DRS. DRS can overturn the out decision but not the dead ball. (Clearly not enough evidence to say whether the ball would have got to the boundary or not if the umpire had kept his finger down.)

 

[MW1304]

Not out again haha, this umpire has something against Pant.

 

[honestbharani]

Absolute idiot, this umpire. That LBW hit only the inside edge, did not even hit the pad I thought.