Yeah I really don't get what the selectors are doing.They shouldn't have sent him home after deciding he was the number 3 in Asia.
Hard to just come back in after being sat in England for two tests.
Lawrence playing out of position was nonsense for his career.
Bairstow is never a number 3 but they made that decision and they should have stuck to it.
Even Kaushal Silva a few years ago made a ton against Australia I think with a broken digit or two.Daily reminder that Allan Border made 196 at Lord’s in the 1985 Ashes with a broken thumb.
Crawley? Why? He is an excellent young batsman.You know, he's crap. But his shots are nice.
Not sure about him v spin but against the quicks he looks awesome imoI'm not convinced yet with Crawley, one huge score and nothing else is all a bit Rob Key like to me. Hope he is the real deal as we can't rely on Root and Stokes alone.
Still lost the series like a chump thoughDaily reminder that Allan Border made 196 at Lord’s in the 1985 Ashes with a broken thumb.
The thing about players like that is, he has the shots to get runs when he gets set. Its obvious he picks the ball earlier than a regular batsman, but so does Pope. To me, Crawley looks more likely to make big runs and be a match winner coz he simply has more options to score runs than a Pope. Hence my prediction all the way back to last year's England - Pak series where I said he could be a better bet than Pope. Pope more Ian Bell while Crawley more KP/Root AFAIC.There's something there with Crawley but there's still a way to go for him to bring his whole game together imo. He looked clueless in Sri Lanka.