Cheating India making pitch unplayable in 4th innings, win toss win match, par score 180, ICC = BCCI = ICICI
Loved the reaction of Lawrence as well. Like one of those guards in the ancient times who had to watch king having *** with the queen, but can't react as they have been told not to.
what is your pointThey
Are you still playing with the kids in your backyard?
lmfao at your technical advice yesterday
I mean it took Kohli and the Indian side the whole 15 seconds to review so it's not like they were convinced it was out. Lots of moving parts to pick up in real time.how could he give kohli out but that one not out? lol. if he thought he hit it he should have raised his finger considering pant caught it. anyways another one to add to the list in this game.
Are you still having dinner?Are you still playing with the kids in your backyard?
That's because Ashwin insisted they must review which made the rest doubt whether it was worth reviewing it.I mean it took Kohli and the Indian side the whole 15 seconds to review so it's not like they were convinced it was out. Lots of moving parts to pick up in real time.
The issue is that the ball tracker has it wrong as the ball hit him well in line of the stumps as you can literally see off-stump when the ball hits his pads. I have no idea what they were arguing about the review but I thought, on first look, it was either caught or LBW and it HAD to be one of the two.I mean it took Kohli and the Indian side the whole 15 seconds to review so it's not like they were convinced it was out. Lots of moving parts to pick up in real time.
You have been here for years and still haven’t learned a thingAre you still having dinner?
You have been here for years and still haven’t learned a thing
What’s up with that?
Nah, missing middle.That was plumb
lackz your contactz obviouslyYou have been here for years and still haven’t learned a thing
What’s up with that?
I'm not saying Root wasn't pretty lucky to get away with that and I know the "close" element of each of those decisions was different, but when an on-field umpire gives a two similarly close (in margin terms) decisions once each way (from a batting/bowling POV, I know both decisions went in England's favour), they're not being "inconsistent" imo. They're simply giving their opinion on impact/hitting etc based on that particular ball, "umpire's call" isn't a thing at that point, it's just yes/no on each factor involved.how could he give kohli out but that one not out? lol. if he thought he hit it he should have raised his finger considering pant caught it. anyways another one to add to the list in this game.
I have enough chappalls at my house, kthxbi social.lackz your contactz obviously
can you put him in touch with chappell by any chance
The ball tracker isn’t right or wrong, it just shows what happened then shows what it calculates will happen. On this occasion it showed that part of the ball struck in line and part of the ball struck outside the line.The issue is that the ball tracker has it wrong
Don't see Bess coming back.Root had the luck of all ages there! But what goes around comes around. The irony of it..!! Bairstow & Crawley have to play next test, which two miss out? Bess comes back. Olly Stone has been really good.
Yeah the ball tracker's fine, umpire's call for impact is just stupid as a concept.The ball tracker isn’t right or wrong, it just shows what happened then shows what it calculates will happen. On this occasion it showed that part of the ball struck in line and part of the ball struck outside the line.