If Tim Paine was the bowler.That is ludicrous. If you're going to enforce it, enforce it consistently.
I think it was just a cookie-cutter "you bowled too many bouncers in a row" ruling, which is not how that rule should be enforcedWas it a light-based ruling to an extent? In which case they shouldn't be out there/
Also, light might be a reason they haven't declared already.
Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?Looked like 3 bouncers in a row so a no ball regardless. Is there any rule around 3rd and subsequent no balls in an over being considered intimidatory?
Yeah it's improved a lot since I last checked. Should mostly be overnight rain apparently.Apparently the forecast is now pretty decent for tomorrow. This could be a really good day five if the rain stays away.
Comms claimed that he was warned for intimidatory bowling. Hopefully that's wrongIs it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?
comms said intimidatory bowling but idk if they're right.Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?
I went back and checked and he definitely said ‘intimidatory bowling’. I wondered whether there was some sort of guideline around illegal bowling being considered inherently intimidating.Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?