Yeah whenever I've seen in bowl in the Shield and doing well, he's done it with full outswingers.i have to say, green was on earlier when he was bowling and it's only early in his career but he can't get sucked in by being freakishly tall to consistently bowling the "unlucky" morkel length at test level - he's better than that when he gets the ball up, but it's a habit every super tall pacer can find themselves lulled in to based on the plays and misses that it draws
You just love to see ittrundler fuming
i think in context though unless you trust sundar and thakur's batting you'd have to say the two wickets outweigh the runs though? could have a six out all out situation hereSession split because India have scored at a good click despite losing two crucial wickets.
We need 50+ more each at least from both these batsmen though.
Yeah obviously but that's because of a ****house lower order that you can't realistically expect a top order to completely cover for IMO. Australia is ahead due to the difference in quality between the sides but given the possibility of either of the batsman getting out very early as well mean I'd take 80-90 runs from 2 batsman and 100+ for the session.i think in context though unless you trust sundar and thakur's batting you'd have to say the two wickets outweigh the runs though? could have a six out all out situation here
Some struggle to start against a softened ball like shane watsonI've always wondered why more openers who look ok but not great don't get tried down the order more often.
Like maybe they just picked wrongly in school and then have been confined to the toughest batting position in cricket since.
yeah that's a fair callYeah obviously but that's because of a ****house lower order that you can't realistically expect a top order to completely cover for IMO. Australia is ahead due to the difference in quality between the sides but given the possibility of either of the batsman getting out very early as well mean I'd take 80-90 runs from 2 batsman and 100+ for the session.