• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

let’s remember some guys

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Geoff Arnold.

A little before my time & probably a wee bit too good for the thread (115 test wickets at a tick over 28), but I was put in mind of him doing one of those Sporcle quizzes yesterday.

It was "Name the year end No.1 ranked test bowlers" from 1946 to 2020. I got 72/76, missing Bill Voce in 46, Hugh Tayfield in 55 & 57 (both of whom I maybe should've got) and dear old Horse (GG Arnold, you see? GG: Horse, nevermind…) in 73 (well, he was equal top with Bishen Bedi, anyway), who I never would've got in far longer than the 10 minutes given.

When one thinks of some of the names never to achieve this (Holding, Walsh, Wasim, Snow & Statham, to name but a few) I was a little surprised, but fair play to him.
He timed it pretty well in terms of reaching number 1 in 1973. I think Lillee was injured, and the next batch of the 1970s uber-quicks (Thomson, Roberts and Holding) hadn't played yet. Snow had an iffy few years after the 1970/71 Ashes; missed much of 1971 for disciplinary reasons, did OK in the 1972 Ashes but tanked badly in our 1973 series for some reason. Plus Arnold actually went to India in 1972/73 and did reasonably well. Then of course, you have the SA bowlers of that era who weren't able to play test cricket. Without checking, I'd guess that the next best ranked quicks were the WI not-as good- as what-followed generation of Boyce, Julien and Holder. But I think they'd only had one good series (in England, naturally) by the end of 1973. Sarfraz may have been there of thereabouts too, but I think he came along a year or two later. Imran and Hadlee had played a few tests but were very young indeed. So not a golden age for bowlers, but Arnold was a reasonable performer.

Good effort getting 72 out of 76 btw.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
He timed it pretty well in terms of reaching number 1 in 1973. I think Lillee was injured, and the next batch of the 1970s uber-quicks (Thomson, Roberts and Holding) hadn't played yet. Snow had an iffy few years after the 1970/71 Ashes; missed much of 1971 for disciplinary reasons, did OK in the 1972 Ashes but tanked badly in our 1973 series for some reason. Plus Arnold actually went to India in 1972/73 and did reasonably well. Then of course, you have the SA bowlers of that era who weren't able to play test cricket. Without checking, I'd guess that the next best ranked quicks were the WI not-as good- as what-followed generation of Boyce, Julien and Holder. But I think they'd only had one good series (in England, naturally) by the end of 1973. Sarfraz may have been there of thereabouts too, but I think he came along a year or two later. Imran and Hadlee had played a few tests but were very young indeed. So not a golden age for bowlers, but Arnold was a reasonable performer.

Good effort getting 72 out of 76 btw.
Ha, ta.

Luckily one didn't have to match the bowler with the year nor was penalised for wrong guesses, so it was more "name as many quality postwar bowlers as you can", really.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Geoff Allott and Neil Johnson, 2 guys who tore up the '99 WC against some star studded sides but a year later were both pretty much retired
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Imran Nazir another good one. I saw him play back to back blistering knocks in the original t20 WC semi final and final and thought he was gonna be a star
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Mitch McClenaghan bowled what seemed to me the best delivery of the 2015 WC. Can't remember against whom but I do remember thinking that. Think he had an excellent start to his ODI career but had fitness issues soon afterwards.
Probably not the 2015 WC - his only game in that tournament was 0-68 v Bangladesh. But, yeah, he did make a superb start to his ODI career, and he played a big role in our semi-finals run in the 2016 World T20 too.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Imran Nazir another good one. I saw him play back to back blistering knocks in the original t20 WC semi final and final and thought he was gonna be a star
He was a batting Sami. Every time he was dropped, the world wondered what happened to such a magnificently talented player. Then there'd be the xth comeback and subsequent failure.

Nazir played 79 ODIs across a decade and was consistently underwhelming. Yet, people think he was a wasted talent.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He was a batting Sami. Every time he was dropped, the world wondered what happened to such a magnificently talented player. Then there'd be the xth comeback and subsequent failure.

Nazir played 79 ODIs across a decade and was consistently underwhelming. Yet, people think he was a wasted talent.
Yeah, at the time(2007) I had no idea he'd been in and out of the side since the 90s, I thought he was some new guy on the scene

Looked a million bucks when actually scoring runs must be said. Killer pull shot
 

Bahseph

International Debutant
Kirk Edward's anyone? The only reason he springs to mind is he was West Indies vice captain at some stage. Probably got his run around the player strike.
 

Flem274*

123/5
kirk edwards was pure cake, and just what the windies needed at the time (still do). it's a shame he faded away.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Richard Ellison effectively came from nowhere to bowl England to victory in the final two tests in the 1985 Ashes. Then injuries kicked in and he barely played for England again.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nasir Jamshed!
Good call, I can remember people rating him back in the day.

Xavier Doherty is one. While his miserable test career will thankfully be forgotten he somehow managed to squeeze 60 ODIs in there and was a fixture for quite a few summers down here without ever doing anything memorable.

Also Chris Tremlett and Steven Finn. Tremlett left quite an impression down here in 2010/11, although his best performance was at Perth where England lost. After the injuries in 2011 he was never able to recapture that form, and his one test in 2013 was painful to watch - he didn't bowl badly, just so slow. I remember really rating Finn, especially after the ODI series in 2012 or 13 (I think?), and thought he had potential greatness in him despite his often being expensive. The whole hitting the stumps fiasco and the modifications to his run really screwed him up. A tremendous waste of talent. It's very hard to think of a time when the impression of England's attack hasn't been 'Broad, Anderson and some other guy'.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Peter Forrest

Such a brief oddity and shocking to think he was in a test squad.
Never liked him. Even when he was in good form around 2012 and was making runs for Australia in ODIs he did it way too slowly
 

Top