• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd Test at the MCG, Melbourne, 26 Dec - 30 Dec 2020

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
hang on hang on hang on. I've just seen these rubbish posts

Concussion subs for batsmen and bowlers shouldn't be allowed. Fielding fine.
Batsmen and bowlers are fixed. Subs can come as fielders. If a batsman has concussion, one from outside the XI has never batted. It just brings in extra fuel power for the XI and is overcompensation as far as cricket is concerned.
He can be subbed. No one is saying that he can't be. As a fielder. No one is forcing a player to bat or bowl after the concussion. Players have gone out of matches and got brain scans and opted out. No one is forcing players to play after such injuries. There should be protocols against it. However that doesnt mean a team can have new bowlers or batsmen.
Do you literally not recall the time Gautam Gambhir got concussed and was basically forced to come out to bat at 8, and was made out to be the bad guy because he didn't come out to open? You need subs because people who suffer a traumatic brain injury should not play until they recover, and players will refuse to cooperate with the medical team unless they know they're not letting the team down. what a pile of **** this is.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
hang on hang on hang on. I've just seen these rubbish posts







Do you literally not recall the time Gautam Gambhir got concussed and was basically forced to come out to bat at 8, and was made out to be the bad guy because he didn't come out to open? You need subs because people who suffer a traumatic brain injury should not play until they recover, and players will refuse to cooperate with the medical team unless they know they're not letting the team down. what a pile of **** this is.
no but i don't like it
 

cnerd123

likes this
I've said this before, but I think subs are less necessary in Cricket than they are in other team sports. It's only necessary in fielding, but in batting and bowling the impact of losing a player varies depending on player and match circumstances.

Concussion subs are good to protect the long term health of our athletes, but if there was a way to get them to stop playing the match without a sub -the way we treat getting a broken arm for example- then that would be ideal for me too.

Or maybe move towards allowing subs for all game ending injuries. Idk. I understand the reason behind the current rules but i do find subs in Test cricket weird and the inconsistency between a sever external injury and a concussion can't be maintained forever.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Do you literally not recall the time Gautam Gambhir got concussed and was basically forced to come out to bat at 8, and was made out to be the bad guy because he didn't come out to open? You need subs because people who suffer a traumatic brain injury should not play until they recover, and players will refuse to cooperate with the medical team unless they know they're not letting the team down. what a pile of **** this is.
Some of the posts from the CW posters in the match thread when that happened look terrible now.
 

Top