• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Vote for Five Cricketers of the 2000s + 2010s

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
de Villiers has more claim than Sanga. You can't just assume that Sanga would have been as prolific as he was a specialist batsman if he had been keeping as well. He stopped keeping for a reason. Only thing holding ABdV back is that he didn't do the job enough to push Gilchrist for the title. I'm of the opinion that he probably had the ability and capacity to do it, but we'll never know.

A lot of people on here have clearly never kept wickets at a decent level for 80+ overs. It's a gruelling job. I did it as a youngster, a couple of times for up to 100-110 overs and it's enough to make me never want to do it again, and I got a week off before having to do it again. I can't imagine how much tougher it would be at Test level and having to back up a couple of days later.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Sanga scored 13378 runs in ODIs as keeper with 23 hundreds @43.74
His peak in ODIs as keeper gave 6356 runs @52.6 with 15 hundreds

Shows something
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sanga scored 13378 runs in ODIs as keeper with 23 hundreds @43.74
His peak in ODIs as keeper gave 6356 runs @52.6 with 15 hundreds

Shows something
Keeping in ODIs is a completely different ballgame. I actually found that keeping in white ball cricket helped my batting, especially when fielding first. It gives you a great feel for how the wicket is playing and conditions in general when you've kept for 45-50 overs then go out to bat.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Keeping in ODIs is a completely different ballgame. I actually found that keeping in white ball cricket helped my batting, especially when fielding first. It gives you a great feel for how the wicket is playing and conditions in general when you've kept for 45-50 overs then go out to bat.

So obviously Gilly's ODI record is cod ordinary then...
 

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Keeping in ODIs is a completely different ballgame. I actually found that keeping in white ball cricket helped my batting, especially when fielding first. It gives you a great feel for how the wicket is playing and conditions in general when you've kept for 45-50 overs then go out to bat.
You are a part time keeper?


Explains a lot tbh
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So obviously Gilly's ODI record is cod ordinary then...
Nah I reckon he did alright. Average high-30s at the strike rate he did was very good in that era, he played a lot against very good bowlers for the first half of his career too. And what's with the use of extremes ITT from some of you guys. Since when is not being the ATG considered "cod ordinary" or to use srbhkshk's earlier term "a real spud". It's a weird attitude.

You are a part time keeper?


Explains a lot tbh
I was ok. Probably reduced oppositions scores by ~30% by blokes getting out to get away from me annoying the **** out of them. Also back in the phase when you could straight-up abuse people.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
warne
mcgrath
murali
steyn
kallis
2 and 5 I would agree with. One and Four arguable. Three a no from me.

Your avatar reminds me that we need to talk about the elephant in the room. There's a reason why so many people who have played at, administered and/ or reported on the game at the highest level omit Murali from their ATG/ Teams of Whatever.

It's because deep down in places they don't want to talk about for fear of offending the SC cabal, they know the laws of the game were changed to accommodate him, and that even after that happened, he was told he couldn't bowl the doosra because it was essentially a baseball pitch, yet he kept doing it. The first is, of course, not his fault but is certainly enough to put the * next to his record for any reasonable student of the game. The second is an indictment on him. Seems a decent bloke and all, but if that was the requirement for selection you'd pick Darren Sammy five times.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
2 and 5 I would agree with. One and Four arguable. Three a no from me.

Your avatar reminds me that we need to talk about the elephant in the room. There's a reason why so many people who have played at, administered and/ or reported on the game at the highest level omit Murali from their ATG/ Teams of Whatever.

It's because deep down in places they don't want to talk about for fear of offending the SC cabal, they know the laws of the game were changed to accommodate him, and that even after that happened, he was told he couldn't bowl the doosra because it was essentially a baseball pitch, yet he kept doing it. The first is, of course, not his fault but is certainly enough to put the * next to his record for any reasonable student of the game. The second is an indictment on him. Seems a decent bloke and all, but if that was the requirement for selection you'd pick Darren Sammy five times.

Lol @ the load of crap... Not taking sledger's ban well, are you?
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's true though. there's no other reasonable explanation as to why so many people who've played against him leave him out.
 

Top