stand by this take absolutely. beautiful stuff on masood's part and great work taking advantage of tiring bowlers - while wood is in the bank and stokes apparently isn't too far off, putting broaderson to the sword and putting miles in to their legs will undoubtedly help pak later in the series when matches are so condensed; something WI couldn't do and came back to bite themalpha innings from masood, who i didn't really have tickets on but has consistently performed just when i'm willing to draw a line through his name. especially in a tightly packed series where england has gone in to the game with all their bowlers, there's such an underrated value in a guy who's just blunting that new ball and putting mileage into the bowlers' bodies. cerebrally dominant and will pay dividends later in the series if his teammates back the grit up
yea i don't know why trying to injure opposition bowlers by grinding them into a hospital ward isn't more of a tactic.stand by this take absolutely. beautiful stuff on masood's part and great work taking advantage of tiring bowlers - while wood is in the bank and stokes apparently isn't too far off, putting broaderson to the sword and putting miles in to their legs will undoubtedly help pak later in the series when matches are so condensed; something WI couldn't do and came back to bite them
And it's not like there haven't been any successful teams with only four bowlers, even if we'd prefer to play five. Whereas this batting line-up always looked optimistic. Perhaps it was easier than having to make a tough call about dropping one of the bowlers. Has Stokes' injury led to any belated criticism of Root's decision to make him bowl those 10 or 11 over spells in the 2nd WI test? It was worrying at the time and it's come back to bite our collective arse here. Of course, if Pope and Buttler add another 200 then I'll deny ever posting this.I really don't get our team selection at all, we've completely messed with a structure that was working. We may have won the last game with it, but it obviously can't last.
I doubt whether Pakistan would enforce the follow-on even if they tale the last six wickets in a hurry. The only possible reason would be to avoid their guys bowling last in this game and maybe bowling first next week, but that's not the strongest argument.Could be a painful day if we lose Pope and Buttler early and end up narrowly avoiding the follow on. Fingers crossed these two boys ride the early storm, stay positive, and make inroads on that Pakistan score. Hoping for another fantastic day!
Abbas is pretty good at reversing as is indicated by his success on dry UAE tracks that offer not much else to a medium pacerAnd it's not like there haven't been any successful teams with only four bowlers, even if we'd prefer to play five. Whereas this batting line-up always looked optimistic. Perhaps it was easier than having to make a tough call about dropping one of the bowlers. Has Stokes' injury led to any belated criticism of Root's decision to make him bowl those 10 or 11 over spells in the 2nd WI test? It was worrying at the time and it's come back to bite our collective arse here. Of course, if Pope and Buttler add another 200 then I'll deny ever posting this.
Changing the subject, do we know if the current generation of Pakistan quicks are as good at reversing the old ball as they are with the new one? if so, we're in even bigger trouble than we thought.
No I agree, my point was less about whether or not they’d enforce the follow on if they could and more about the fact that England will be close to 200 runs behind and a long way behind in this one.I doubt whether Pakistan would enforce the follow-on even if they tale the last six wickets in a hurry. The only possible reason would be to avoid their guys bowling last in this game and maybe bowling first next week, but that's not the strongest argument.
Must be easier to face a bowler reversing it at late 70’s mph though surely?Abbas is pretty good at reversing as is indicated by his success on dry UAE tracks that offer not much else to a medium pacer
Do the phantoms of Aldermen and Philander not haunt you still?Must be easier to face a bowler reversing it at late 70’s mph though surely?
Not as much as Wasim and Waqar!Do the phantoms of Aldermen and Philander not haunt you still?
Nah, mainly got his wickets with the same exaggerated movement off the pitch that Asif used to get on dry tracks. For some reason they don't move the ball as much on what should be more favourable surfaces.Abbas is pretty good at reversing as is indicated by his success on dry UAE tracks that offer not much else to a medium pacer
There was definitely talk of reverse in the Oz series in UAENah, mainly got his wickets with the same exaggerated movement off the pitch that Asif used to get on dry tracks. For some reason they don't move the ball as much on what should be more favourable surfaces.
Can't think of any UAE test where reverse swing has played a really big role. The pitches don't seem to really rough up the ball, more just dull it down, so you don't see the big movement that often.